1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8_murik_8 [283]
3 years ago
15

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain un

alienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. " How does this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence connect to the idea upon which the U.S. government was founded? ONLY ANSWER IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT AND YOU KNOW THE ANSWER FOR SURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
History
2 answers:
Lady bird [3.3K]3 years ago
6 0

This past weekend marked the 234th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  And while much has changed since the signers met in secret to dissolve the bands that tied them to England, their words are as true today as they have ever been. 


The preamble to the Declaration states:


<span>
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government …</span>

The arrangement of this statement reveals the founders’ belief that individual rights pre-exist the establishment of a government-- a radical notion at the time.  The Declaration begins, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”  By referring to the aspects of the subsequent statement as "self-evident truths," the founders insist that they do not merely apply to colonists but rather that they are universal.  Included in these universal truths is the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  This bold assertion insists that no one life is more valuable than the next, and that—by virtue of sharing the same rights—no individual has the authority to rule over or oppress another.


Moreover, the equal rights shared by all humans are “unalienable.”  They cannot be taken away.  This is because they are granted not by any man or institution but rather they are “endowed” upon individuals by their Creator.  Only the One who grants rights has the authority to take them away.


Although the founders believed in the unalienable rights of every person, they also understood that there will always be forces in this world that seek to oppress.  Thus, “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.”  Put simply, the government possesses no rights.  Its sole purpose is to protect the rights of its citizenry from outside forces.  If it fails in this duty, it is the responsibility of individuals to abolish it.


The writers of the Declaration—and subsequently the writers of the Constitution—believed that government’s power comes out of its ability to protect the rights of its people.  Individuals do not receive natural rights from government and thus government does not have the authority to take rights away.  To the extent that it protects individual rights, government operates legitimately.  However, when it fails to protect such rights or when it imposes upon them, it becomes an illegitimate ruler over what would otherwise be free people.


When the founding fathers gathered in 1776, they did not merely declare the independence of the colonies from their British oppressors.  They declared the independence of all individuals from the unlawful intrusion of overreaching government.  And that declaration forever altered the course of human history.

Natali [406]3 years ago
3 0
It was said by George Washington 

You might be interested in
Which of these statements about the Freedmen’s Bureau are true?
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

It faced a great deal of opposition

It failed in most of its efforts

(Sorry it’s a little late but I hope it helps)

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was theNorthwest ordinance of 1787 enacted
WARRIOR [948]

The Northwest Ordinance, was enacted when the Northwest Territory was created to make it a legal territory. It also established the ability of the U.S government to expand westward.

6 0
3 years ago
All of the following are examples of nonrenewable resources except __________. A. oil B. natural gas C. lumber D. coal Please se
Assoli18 [71]

wood, a renewable resource. It is the first fuel that man knew in the world. ... Unlike coal or oil, wood can be obtained almost anywhere you live.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to al bakri in what ways do customs in kumbi saleh differ from customs in arab lands
Blizzard [7]

According to Al Bakri, Kumbi Saleh (Ghana) consisted of two towns. In one town lived the arabs, it held twelve mosquets and numerous wells of sweet water. In this town lived learned men, as well as jurists and religious men. Six miles away laid the city where the king lived (Al Ghaba), in a palace surrounded by a defensive wall.

Only the king and his heir could wear sewn clothes and other accessories, signs of wealth, while the common people that followed his religion could only dress with simplicity, shaving their beards and hair. The king's way of living would exude power, wealth and magnificence, and his followers could only show humility by kneeling and sprinting their heads with dust. While the arabs would greet him by clapping.

As I understand it, the customs in arab lands were much more equal, there were not big social differences between its inhabitants. In the other part of the city, this was not the case, there would be big social differences between the king and its followers, that the author doesn't name bi its etniciti, nationality or religion. They were just the followers of the king.

7 0
3 years ago
Why is heliocentric so important what would i put on a presentation
Mariulka [41]
Heliocentrism <span> is the </span>astronomical<span> model in which the </span>Earth<span> and planets revolve around the </span>Sun<span> at the center of the </span><span>Solar System....i think

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Choose all that apply. Which of the following contributed to European dominance in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries? Europ
    12·2 answers
  • Middle East Partition crossword puzzle
    13·2 answers
  • Which invention most contributed to the spread of the Reformation
    10·2 answers
  • How was government in the French
    10·1 answer
  • (NOT A MAN<br> A BROTHER<br> LAND<br> The purpose of this image was intended to
    13·1 answer
  • Why was Kenya at war in the Shifta War
    13·2 answers
  • Question 17
    11·2 answers
  • What powers did the Confederation have? (Select all that apply.)
    6·1 answer
  • Describe operation Iraqi freedom.
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes Rasmussen’s reason for writing the book?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!