1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilya [14]
3 years ago
13

The skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. How would a historian mo

st likely describe this statement?
History
2 answers:
Oksi-84 [34.3K]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer to this question is "It is truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof."

The skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. A historian most likely describe thisstatement by having it truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof.
GREYUIT [131]3 years ago
3 0
Humans evolved from creatures with a larger in size skull than today's humans. Humans have grown and adapted in todays society. 
You might be interested in
As a result of the partition of India, the Muslims moved to ___________ and the Hindus moved to ____________.
raketka [301]

Answer:

Muslims moved from east Punjab to west Punjab-Hindus moved from west Punjab to east Punjab.

5 0
3 years ago
If you were worried about losing your job, how might that effect how you spent money?
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Because you might be out one day shoping and BAM your job is gone you you wont have a lot of money to spaer. Thats just letting you knw always be smart  and careful about things.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What was one result of the Tariff of 1828?
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

C. It started the Doctrine of Nullification

Explanation:

The trouble began with the <u>Tariff of 1828</u>. The South was afraid the high tariff would hurt their trade with Europe. South Carolina talked about nullifying the tariff. The argument over the <u>"Doctrine of Nullification"</u> was debated in the Senate. Senator Robert Hayne of South Carolina concluded that if a law was harmful to a particular state, it was the right of that state to declare the law null and void. Daniel Webster of Massachusetts argued that only the Supreme Court could declare a law null and void. He ended his speech with this famous quotation: "Liberty and Union now and forever, one and inseparable."

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the 4 Goals of Presidential Reconstruction
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

The Lincoln Reconstruction Plan. The Initial Congressional Plan. The Andrew Johnson Reconstruction Plan. The Radical Republican Reconstruction Plan.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the opening engagement of the civil war
Luden [163]

Answer:

slavery

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Most of the Middle East relies on water pumped from regional aquifers that are being quickly depleted. Most scientists believe t
    11·1 answer
  • Changes made to the Georgia constitution and United States constitusion
    7·1 answer
  • In which branch of the general assembly can bills be introduced
    11·1 answer
  • PLZZ HELP!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLEIST!!!!!! I NEED ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE IS NO ANSWER CHOICES!!!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which is NOT true of Akbar the Great?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement about freedom of religion is correct?
    14·1 answer
  • Anyone know history
    10·1 answer
  • For what reasons did bosses reduce workers' pay?
    11·1 answer
  • Which economic system is defined by a free market and private ownership?
    14·2 answers
  • Can someone help me please ?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!