Answer: As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished. Furthermore, California entered the Union as a free state and a territorial government was created in Utah.
Explanation:
1. The maximum number of bags of free items that Ivan can give away, using the lowest common divisor, is <u>28 bags</u>.
2. The distribution of the free items in each bag is as follows:
Vouchers Pencils Sweets
Number of items 5 2 10
<h3>How is the number determined?</h3>
The number of bags that Ivan can make using the free items can be computed using the lowest common multiple or lowest common divisor.
The lowest common multiple among 140, 56, and 280 is <u>28</u>.
28 can divide the three values without a remainder.
<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>
The number of discount vouchers = 140
The number of pencils = 56
The number of sweets = 280
Vouchers Pencils Sweets
Number of items
(Dividend) 140 56 280
Divisor 28 28 28
Quotient 5 2 10
Thus, Ivan can make <u>28 bags</u> containing <u>5 vouchers, 2 pencils, and 10 sweets</u>.
Learn ing about the lowest common divisor at brainly.com/question/16054958
#SPJ1
Answer:
d. The uneducated, Women, and Slaves
Explanation:
I would say there’s nothing in the first ten amendments that directly states the government’s ability to have or to not have a curfew, but the 1st amendment would allow the right for someone to peacefully disagree.
The 1st Amendment is your freedom of RAPPS,
so it’s freedom of :
R - religion
A - assembly
P - press
P - petition
S - speech
Generally, city wide curfews such as this are more along the lines of a suggestion or a guideline put in place for safety. If someone decides they want to put their safety at risk, that’s on them. But when you start getting into the other aspects of the 1st amendment (like Petition, Assembly, etc.) you start to get into a place where you might violate other laws.
In other words, it’s likely within the right of those who disagree to express their disagreement, but it’s also within the right of the law enforcement to reprimand them if they directly interfere with the safety of others, like the workers restoring the power, for example.
Like at the end of Scream (1996), they have a city-wide curfew because there’s a killer on the loose. Then all of the teenagers decided to have a curfew party to protest the curfew. If those kids had gotten arrested, it wouldn’t have been directly for having the party (a.k.a. the defiance of the curfew) but they might get arrested for drinking alcohol.
