1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
netineya [11]
3 years ago
11

In what ways did Chute-pa-lu laws differ from white laws? Did the two groups share some beliefs about laws? What was the signifi

cance of spirit law," and how did it differ from other laws, if at all?
History
1 answer:
alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: The answer is given below

Explanation:

The chute-pa-lu laws was different from the white laws because they believed that land belonged to everyone, taking another man's land wasn't encouraged and that all men should be treated equally and fairly and that lying is disgraceful. The Chute-pa-lu Laws was typically more peaceful than the white laws.

Chute-pa-lu and white laws shared some beliefs about laws. For example, they both believed that there's a god or a great spirit that sees and hears everything that people do and what we do presently has an effect on our afterlife.

The significance of spirit laws was simply to bring together the people from both groups, and it should be noted that it wasn't really different really at all from the laws of the white men except that they didn’t really speak about everything that they had already planned for the people of Chute-pa-lu.

You might be interested in
Independence movement and consequences in India
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

India was a superpower in that period with a world economy share of  24.4% in 1700 to 4.2% in 1950. Britain had killed over 4 million Indian during the begal famine and left India in a awful condition. East India trade company the company made India one of the wealthiest countries in the world ,. Britain seized it and looted the silicon and golden trade routes.  Brought trade and influence into the country basically owning the global textile trade. Another was raw materials like jute and cotton with their rich agriculture They had very good raw goods such a Dimond and jewels and coffee and spices. Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938. It's a staggering sum. It is estimated that over 15 million people died. India had fallen below poverty and had alot of conflicts due to that aswell which led to the partition of  India - Pakistan - Bangladesh and a still on going war with Muslims vs Hindus

8 0
3 years ago
What event/document are these two?
tatyana61 [14]

Answer: the second one is the U.S. constitution

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will someone help *you know who you are*<br> AND PLEASE DO NOT REPORT ME, PEOPLE!!
Reil [10]

Answer:

fun!

The Neolithic Revolution, also called the Agrarian Revolution, was the change from a nomadic, hunter-gatherer lifestyle to a settled, agrarian one with farming. Farming is more stable and secure and it gives people more time to engage in other activities, such as improving their tools and developing cultures: the Neolithic Revolution contributed to the technological development in the river valley civilizations by giving people time to improve on their technology.

6 0
3 years ago
Write a paragraph about what you would think life would have been like in the Middle Ages.​
Artemon [7]

Answer:

I think that life in the middle ages would be extremely different than how today's time is. In the 2000's we have i-phone 11's and airpod pro max's. Back in the day they didn't have any of that they had no phones no headphones they were lucky if they got anything at all they had to hunt and kill with their bare hands and with guns while today we can drive to the supermarket and get meat in some plastic that is from a cow kept in confindment. Their food was fresh meat and veggies as well as fruit they had it good and their wars were not as bad as ours today ours has cannons and grenades their had guns, knives, and bows and arrows which were not as lethal unless you knew what  you were doing.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was the first permanent English colony in North America?
aksik [14]

Answer:

Jamestown

Explanation:

Founded in Virginia

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During world war ii, racially discriminatory hiring practices in defense industries were prohibited by
    13·1 answer
  • In what way did industrialization in the United States contribute to the rise of the second Ku Klux Klan in the early twentieth
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best compares events in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia during the Obama presidency
    7·2 answers
  • What did britain see its colonies as a source of?
    9·2 answers
  • Which form of government will yours be modeled after?
    15·1 answer
  • Poisonous gas, which was heavier than air, was used in World War 1. Why might gas be a more effective weapon against soldiers in
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the Missouri Compromise created?
    11·1 answer
  • Which geographic factor led to the formation of Iceland's rugged terrain?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the government enforce apartheid in south Africa?
    8·1 answer
  • What are some fundamental beliefs that would be on the Libertarian platform?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!