<em>A.)</em>
<em>I think that it is A because most arguments continue due to emotion, which is even conveyed when someone is trying to prove a point or a fact.</em>
<em>Hope this helps.</em>
。 . . 。 ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ ඞ 。 . • . [Northstar] was ejected. . . 。 . 。 ﾟ . . , . . .. 。 • ﾟ 。 . . . 。。 • ﾟ 。 . . . 。。 • ﾟ 。 . . . 。。 • ﾟ 。 . . . 。
The iron, in "Agua Viva", represents the reality in which the main character, Alfredo Gonzalez lives. Alfredo is involved with the iron most of the time, having mountains of iron parts and iron "junk" scattered through his house; His body, full of iron dust and grease shows us that iron is part of his appearance; We get to know that collecting, counting, cataloging and working with iron was the only thing he did, for many years long. The iron, in the end, <u>is the only thing Alfredo had</u>.
Through the history we get to know that Alfredo, who is a lonely man among the iron, had a son and a family in the past, but we don't know where they are (Maybe even he doesn't know). Alfredo has gone to a institution, probably a mental institution, and since being released, he has lived like that, with the <u>iron as his only "partner"</u>.
After being in <u>contact with another material</u> (the clod the boys have thrown at him) it seems like Alfredo is now in <u>contact with another reality</u>, and finally looks himself in the mirror, seeing only iron in him and in his house and in his life. That is a point of change in his life, it seems to be, when he accepts the help of the neighbor.
Answer:
Killing should never really be considered to be justified whether in a work of fiction or not; however, Rainsford was in a position of kill or be killed. The whole thing is a case of kill or be killed, essentially self defense. I guess it depends on how you view that type of thing, but in my opinion, if Rainsford had not killed Zaroff, then he would have undoubtedly died. Therefore, yes I believe he was justified in his decision.
As with all interpretive questions, your answer is based upon your own reading of the story and how you analyze the plot and characters. Rainsford had escaped Zaroff, and won the game. There was no reason to return to the masion and kill Zaroff except to exact revenge. Consider that Rainsford himself is a hunter, used to being in power. Although he had never considered doing something as inhumane as Zaroff in hunting humans, his choice to kill Zaroff reveals his need to be in control. In this case, his killing of Zaroff isn't about justice, but about revenge.
On the other hand, there is nothing to suggest Zaroff would have quit hunting humans. He was a static character, who didn't change even when he "lost" the hunt of Rainsford. In this reading, the audience can interpret that Rainsford is doing his part for mankind by eliminating the threat of the murderer Zaroff. After all, on this island, there is no justice system by which to prosecute him.
You will need to choose the answer that best supports your understanding of the characters.
He’s goodhearted and not sensitive, he doesn’t think about how this affect others but he knows right from wrong. He’s kinda a combo of being pure and impulsive.
I’m sorry but this says 75 points when ut actually gives 38 points I was going to answer the question it you don’t have all the points
