Interaction refers to A. mutual participation between people or things.
<h3>What is interaction?</h3>
This is known as a kind of action that occurs as two or more objects have an effect on one another. This is reciprocal action or influence.
Hence, we can from the definition, it is seen that interaction is mutual participation between two people or things, it is an action occurring between two things.
Read more about<em> mutual participation</em> here:
brainly.com/question/16101197
#SPJ1
Answer:
The two stories, Stone Fox and Sara Sees are different due to some of the reasons below;
in stone fox, Willy who is the main act; when Willy became a part of the race, coupled with the fact that at first, no one was willing to give him the encouragement he needed, still, he was completely focused, dedication and he gave his utmost determination to finish the race.
In the middle of the race, he sighted his father among the crowd cheering and waving at him not to give up and moved on with the race.
Same can not be said for the main act of Sara Sees.
Sara was the main act of Sara Sees.
Unlike Willy who tries to succeed in spite of the obstacles in front of him, Sara made an attempt to flee the obvious reality in front of her. She tried to hide from her problem.
She learnt her lesson when she came across a woman who despite the pain and difficulties, she was going through, she tried to offer help to someone.
The correct answer is C. Observing what happened to the Spartans and the Romans shows that it is best to destroy a newly acquired state that is accustomed to freedom.
Explanation:
The text focuses on explaining the differences between the Spartans and the Romans when conquering new territories. The author explains the Romans destroyed and dismantled new territories, and were successful. On the opposite, the Spartans were not successful because they only established a government in new territories.
This implies, destroying new states is a better strategy than allowing freedom, this is reinforced by the idea "he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it may expect to be destroyed by it" that shows the need to destroy or dismantle new states to control them. Thus, the main idea is that destruction is the best strategy to use with acquired states which is proven by comparing Spartans and Romans.
Because he was doing drugs
