Domain:
Range:
Asymptote @ y = -1
Red line in picture is the asymptote.
Answer:
The dimensions of the rectangle are length = 7cm and width = 6cm.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to solve for the dimensions, you will need to set up two equations in order to solve for the missing variable. Given the information that the length is 5 cm less then twice it's width, using 'L' for length and 'w' for width we get the following equation: L = 2w - 5. Perimeter is the sum of all the sides, or in the case of a rectangle P = 2w + 2L. We can then use our expression for 'L' in our perimeter formula: 26 = 2w + 2(2w - 5). First, using the distributive property we get: 26 = 2w + 4w - 10. Next, we combine like terms: 26 = 6w - 10. Then, we use inverse operations to isolate the variable: 26 + 10 = 6w - 10 + 10 to get 36 = 6w, divide both sides by 6 to get w = 6. Lastly, plug in the value of 'w' to 'L': L = 2(6) - 5 or L = 7.
1 quart = 32 fluid ounces.
So, 5 quarts = ? fluid ounces.
Lets solve to find ?.
5 × 32 = 160
So, Nadine bout 160 fluid ounces (5 quarts) or oil for her car.
Hope I helped ya!!
Count all the sides then add them up
Answer:
B) No fallacy.
Step-by-step explanation:
There is no fallacy in these sentences. There is no slippery slope since the comparison doesn't include any prediction for the consequences. There also no authority mentioned in the question. The analogy is not weak since Gabriella's hair virtually identical to Francesca's. It's hard to prove that something false cause just from one occurrence, you can assume it's not since there is no further information.