1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
skad [1K]
3 years ago
10

Which is the best source or historical evidence

History
1 answer:
yulyashka [42]3 years ago
4 0
To learn about an event unfolded in a newspaper account writen when the event accured
You might be interested in
What does the term “Final Solution” mean? How many Jews lost their lives during the Holocaust?
djverab [1.8K]
The final solution was the Nazis' answer to a problem that they didn't have. It consisted of demonizing and persecuting people they didn't like, and then working them, starving them, and killing them. Roughly six million Jews died during the Nazi Holocaust.
5 0
3 years ago
DEFINE the term, "The Holocaust," please complete a little research to discover more about what "The Holocaust" was; then, write
choli [55]

Answer:

destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war.

Explanation:

The Holocaust, also known as the Shoah, was the genocide of European Jews during World War II. Between 1941 and 1945, Nazi Germany and its collaborators systematically murdered some six million Jews across German-occupied Europe, around two-thirds of Europe's Jewish population.

5 0
2 years ago
EASY BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!
Amanda [17]

Answer:

B. the notion that communism could spread to neighboring states through close contact

Explanation:

during the cold War, the domino theory was that if one state would fall into communism, the rest would follow.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In ancient Ghana, the next king would be the son of the current king’s sister. Which of the following words describes this syste
ella [17]
This would be matrilineal, where the line of the mother was the relevant line, and not of the father: in order to be a king, one needed to have the royal mother and the father was irrelevant. The dynasty would be traced by the female line in this case (even if the kings were the rulers). 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Einhard was a member of Charlemagne’s court and described him as “my lord and foster-father”. He also wrote that, “no man can wr
Maurinko [17]

Answer:SINCE I have taken upon myself to narrate the public and private life, and no small part of the deeds, of my lord and foster-father, the most lent and most justly renowned King Charles, I have condensed the matter into as brief a form as possible. I have been careful not to omit any facts that could come to my knowledge, but at the same time not to offend by a prolix style those minds that despise everything modern, if one can possibly avoid offending by a new work men who seem to despise also the masterpieces of antiquity, the works of most learned and luminous writers. Very many of them, l have no doubt, are men devoted to a life of literary leisure, who feel that the affairs of the present generation ought not to be passed by, and who do not consider everything done today as unworthy of mention and deserving to be given over to silence and oblivion , but are nevertheless seduced by lust of immortality to celebrate the glorious deeds of other times by some sort of composition rather than to deprive posterity of the mention of their own names by not writing at all.

Be this as it may, I see no reason why I should refrain from entering upon a task of this kind, since no man can write with more accuracy than I of events that took place about me, and of facts concerning which I had personal knowledge, ocular demonstration as the saying goes, and I have no means of ascertaining whether or not any one else has the subject in hand.

In any event, I would rather commit my story to writing, and hand it down to posterity in partnership with others, so to speak, than to suffer the most glorious life of this most excellent king, the greatest of all the princes of his day, and his illustrious deeds, hard for men of later times to imitate, to be wrapped in the darkness of oblivion.

But there are still other reasons, neither unwarrantable nor insufficient, in my opinion, that urge me to write on this subject, namely, the care that King Charles bestowed upon me in my childhood, and my constant friendship with himself and his children after I took up my abode at court. In this way he strongly endeared me to himself, and made me greatly his debtor as well in death as in life, so that were I unmindful of the benefits conferred upon me, to keep silence concerning the most glorious and illustrious deeds of a man who claims so much at my hands, and suffer his life to lack due eulogy and written memorial, as if he had never lived, I should deservedly appear ungrateful, and be so considered, albeit my powers are feeble, scanty, next to nothing indeed, and not at all adapted to write and set forth a life that would tax the eloquence of a Tully [note: Tully is Marcus Tullius Cicero].

I submit the book. It contains the history of a very great and distinguished man; but there is nothing in it to wonder at besides his deeds, except the fact that I, who am a barbarian, and very little versed in the Roman language, seem to suppose myself capable of writing gracefully and respectably in Latin, and to carry my presumption so far as to disdain the sentiment that Cicero is said in the first book of the Tusculan Disputations to have expressed when speaking of the Latin authors. His words are: "It is an outrageous abuse both of time and literature for a man to commit his thoughts to writing without having the ability either to arrange them or elucidate them, or attract readers by some charm of style." This dictum of the famous orator might have deterred me from writing if I had not made up my mind that it was better to risk the opinions of the world, and put my little talents for composition to the test, than to slight the memory of so great a man for the sake of sparing myself.

Explanation:

did report made 93.6 plz mark brainist

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was included in the Republican Party of 1854? Select four responses.
    9·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, how did trade unions differ from labor unions?
    11·2 answers
  • What motivated americans to seek an empire
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Antifederalists feel about the issue of slavery?
    14·2 answers
  • Is it true that African Americans lived lives that were "separate but equal" in the decades after Reconstruction?
    6·2 answers
  • When was the first word war?<br>•1914<br>•1934<br>•1987​
    11·2 answers
  • Which group joined the anti-Catholic campaign against presidential candidate Al Smith? PLEASE I NEED HELP
    15·1 answer
  • PLZ HURRY
    14·1 answer
  • Compare and discuss the immorality of all the participants of World War II.
    6·2 answers
  • American <br> He's an American who fought in the Italian war.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!