Answer:
D. Spanish Colonization
Explanation:
Spanish Colonization started when Christopher Columbus found the Natives and turned them into slaves and made them mine gold for his own profit, he also tried to sell them away as slaves. When more people started to come to America during the Spanish Colonization, diseases and illnesses killed many Native Americans as they had no illness resistance. Lots of Natives were also forced into slavery by the Spanish, mostly in mining as lots of gold and other profitable materials were there. Eventually, as many of the Natives kept dying of diseases the Spanish decided to get African Americans for slaves instead as they had a better resistance against diseases and illnesses.
The main similarity between social movements stated below was that they all argued for a fight against oppression and discrimination.
<h3>What are
Social movement?</h3>
These refer to an organized effort that aim to create change in society, politics or economics by campaigning, protesting, advocating etc.
The most effective and notable Social movement in America includes:
- the civil rights movement
- American Revolution
- women's suffrage movement
- second-wave feminism
- environmentalism and conservation efforts.
In conclusion, the similarity between social movements above was that they all argued for a fight against oppression and discrimination.
Read more about Social movement
<em>brainly.com/question/13062533</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
1.Putting her convictions into practice, she worked diligently to improve the lives of working people and immigrants in rapidly expanding American cities by helping establish Hull House, a settlement house for immigrants in Chicago.
Explanation:
They feared that war would undermine all their efforts to achieve social justice and democracy. Addams risked her prestigious reputation by opposing World War I. ... Even after public opinion shifted and forced Addams out of the mainstream, she continued to advocate for world peace
<em>"'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776 </em>
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.