The Greco-Persian Wars were actually two independent conflicts. The first conflict happened in 490 BCE. The second conflict occurred between 480 and 479 BCE.
<h3>
How were the motivations of the participants in the Greco-Persian Wars different?</h3>
There was not enough agriculture in Greece to accommodate a big population due to its extensive hilly terrain. As a result, several city-states would send a portion of their populace to establish colonies along the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea. Some of these colonies were established in Ionia, on the western coast of Asia Minor (today's Turkey). Lydia, a nearby regional power to the east, finally seized control of the Ionian colonies.
Lydia was captured by the Persians as they grew in power to the west. Ionia followed suit, so did they. Ionia, however, proved to be very challenging for the Persians to govern because the local Greek population bitterly resented Persian rule. In 499 BCE, the Ionians rose up in opposition to Persian rule. In their battle with the Persians, the Ionians put up a fierce fight and were difficult to subdue. The Ionians asked for assistance from the other Greek city-states, which only made Persia's issues worse. In response to their cries for assistance, Athens and Eretria dispatched a number of ships and soldiers to aid their uprising in 498 BCE. In the end, despite their assistance, the Ionians were subdued in 493 BCE. However, Darius I, the Persian monarch, was extremely incensed by it.
To know more about, the Greco-Persian Wars, visit :
brainly.com/question/29421523
#SPJ1
Most slaves were field workers, easily replaced, and therefore, the Europeans filled their pockets with goods from West Coast Africa, including human cargo.
Hope this answer helps.
The Czar<span> reacted to the </span>Revolution<span> 0f </span>1905 by<span> promising to form Dumas which were representative assemblies, to work towards reform. </span>
Technology during World War I (1914-1918) reflected a trend toward industrialism and the application of mass-productionmethods to weapons and to the technology of warfare in general. This trend began at least fifty years prior to World War Iduring the American Civil War of 1861-1865,[1] and continued through many smaller conflicts in which soldiers and strategists tested new weapons.
One could characterize the earlier years of the First World War as a clash of 20th-century technology with 19th-century warfare in the form of ineffective battles with huge numbers of casualties on both sides. On land, only in the final year of the war did the major armies made effective steps in revolutionizing matters of command and control and tactics to adapt to the modern battlefield and start to harness the myriad new technologies to effective military purposes. Tactical reorganizations (such as shifting the focus of command from the 100+ man company to the 10+ man squad) went hand-in-hand with armored cars, the first submachine guns, and automatic rifles that a single individual soldier could carry and use.
Loneliness is apparent in the passage, because first of all she is clearly lonely, and second of all because loneliness is a theme throughout the majority of the novel.