The inference is that the contractor will prevail because the homeowner agreed to the price increase.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given.
In this base, inference is that the contractor will prevail because the homeowner agreed to the price increase.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
the contribution margin per unit for part A is $1,479,000
Explanation:
The computation of the contribution margin for part A is shown below:
Contribution margin per unit is
= $950 - $600 - $95
= $255
Now for contribution margin per unit for part A is
= 5,800 units × $255
= $1,479,000
Hence, the contribution margin per unit for part A is $1,479,000
Answer:
The two optimal two part price that would be suggested to Verizon is Unit per Fee = $1 and Lump Sum fee or fixed fee = $99
Explanation:
Solution
For us fully maximize profit under two part price It should gives that amount of wireless service at which P = MC and and also charge Lump sum fee or fixed fee equals to the consumers surplus that consumer will have.
Now,
marginal cost= MC = 1 and P = 100 - 25Q.
Thus,
P = MC => 100 - 25Q = 1 => Q = 2
Then,
The Consumer surplus is the above area Price of line which is (iP = 1) and below is the curve of demand
Now,
P = 100, When Q = 0 The Consumer surplus = (1/2)*base*height
= (1/2)*(100 - 1)*2 = 99
Therefore, Fixed fee or The Lump Sum fee = 99
However, the Optimal two part pricing is denoted by:
The Unit per Fee = $1 and Lump Sum fee or fixed fee = $99
The statement "Henry is not required to report the $12,000 alimony received as income and Charlotte cannot claim alimony paid as an adjustment to income " is True
Explanation:
Significant information provided - The divorce between Charlotte and Henry was finalized in January 2019 and split in 2018.
Charlotte paid $12000 for Henry's foodstuffs in 2019.
The review and conclusion of the study - In the case of the divorce finalized in 2019 or later, the food allowance is now no longer deducible and is not declared as wages by the beneficiary according to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
In that case, the $12000 under income received will not be declared by Henry and Charlotte is not entitled to claim alimony as a result of salary adjustment.
So, Option B is correct statement.
