In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
Answer:
Explanation:
My friends cheered as I scored the winning goal.
That’s the first person view!
Hope it helps!
<span>Both can be written in prose, which can make the piece more relatable to the average reader. By not being written in poetry, the piece can also take a tone that is more conversational in style. This allows the writer to have a bit more leeway when it comes to using other literary devices to make their points.</span>
this is a metaphor. its not hyerbole because it isnt a exxragtion
