I believe Daisy was more in love with the lust that he showed in her rather than true love because if she loved him she wouldn't have married tom
According to the principles of financial education, Fred should buy the materials he needs and leave it to buy the pair of designer jeans at another time.
<h3>What is financial education?</h3>
- It is teaching how to use money in a coherent way.
- It is teaching how to organize finances.
- It is teaching about being economically stable.
One of the main principles of financial education is the use of money in necessary elements. Therefore, we can say that Fred should spend the money he received on the materials he needs, as a pair of designer jeans is not something of extreme necessity.
However, financial education says that we should be happy with the use of money. That means Fred shouldn't give up the urge to own a pair of designer jeans. he will just have to wait a little longer, save money and buy them consciously.
More information about financial education is at the link:
brainly.com/question/10565546
This might be interpreted as "My beloved and I will have to be reunited in heaven because the earth persecutes me for loving."
- The poem's opening line, "The world no longer let me love, / My hope and treasure rests above," conveys the concept that finding solace in the knowledge that she has a permanent home waiting for her in heaven can be a source of peace.
- The narrator asserts that the writer finds solace in the thought that she has a permanent home waiting for her in paradise even if her home were to burn down and be completely ruined.
- The author had a house fire, which resulted in the total destruction of everything inside. She believes that other places are where she may find her dreams and wealth, and that this world is not her home.
Thus the correct option is A.
Refer here to learn more about this poem: brainly.com/question/24532910
#SPJ9
Answer:
A: Mocking to earnest: while the author ridicules the oracular woman, she assumes a serious tone when describing the woman of culture.
Explanation: In the first two paragraphs, the author’s contemptuous attitude toward the “oracular literary woman” is apparent. The author describes the behavior of such women as “the most mischievous form of feminine silliness,” and lines such as “she spoils the taste of one’s muffin by questions of metaphysics” clearly portray the oracular woman as an object of ridicule. On the other hand, when describing the “woman of true culture,” the author adopts a more earnest tone as she paints the virtues of this figure—her modesty, consideration for others, and genuine literary talent—in idealized terms. A writer’s shifts in tone from one part of a text to another may suggest the writer’s qualification or refinement of their perspective on a subject. In this passage, the author’s sincere, idealized portrait of the woman of true culture plays an important role in qualifying the argument of the passage: although the author agrees with the men in line 41 that the “literary form” of feminine silliness deserves ridicule, she rejects generalizations about women’s intellectual abilities that the oracular woman unwittingly reinforces. Embodying the author’s vision of what women could attain if they were given a “more solid education,” the figure of the cultured woman serves to temper the derisive (mocking) portrayal of women intellectuals in the first part of the passage.
