This question is incomplete because the passage from the source Miral wants to include is missing; here is the passage:
Read the excerpt from a credible source for Mirai's research-based essay on the effects of the declining bee population.
Honeybees play a major role in the pollination of produce sold in the United States. Without the prolific support of honeybees, the nation's agricultural economy will suffer losses as great as those in the bee population.
The correct answer to this question is C. She should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way.
Explanation:
In general, you can include credible sources by quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing this. Additionally, it is recommended to paraphrase or summarize the information if the information is general or can be restated without losing its essence. On the opposite, you should quote if the wording is unique, which means using your own words will affect the essence of the information, and if the piece of evidence directly supports the main argument.
According to this, in the source presented it recommended Mirai quotes the second sentence because this directly supports her main argument about the effects of the decline in the bees population. Also, the wording on it is unique and would be difficult to replace. For example, the expression "the nation's agricultural economy will suffer losses as great as those in the bee population" would lose its argumentative strength unique style if it is paraphrased or summarized.
Answer:
b) the fact that the artichoke is proud
Explanation:
This information affects the story the most, therefore should be included in the summary.
<u>It tells us a lot about the artichoke, how he behaves, and this detail also influences his interaction with the muskrat. This way we see the character better and know what kind of development of the story we can expect. </u>
For example, if artichoke wasn't that proud, maybe muskrat wouldn't even notice it, maybe he wouldn't feel irritated at artichoke's pride, and the interaction wouldn't resemble the quarrels.
In the second-person narrative, there should be only one character's thoughts presented, usually it's the narrator's.
Here you go.
Much to Bradfords astonishment, Samoset addressed the Pilgrims in broken English. Samoset persuaded his kindred Indians' to restore the pioneer's apparatuses. He influenced Massasoit to offer his regards to the Pilgrims and acquainted them with one of his friend's, Squanto.
Explanation:
HELLO j ó i n frIends ☺️✌
SWO-XMHJ-WTQ
