Skim through the story it should be there or look up the question
They had signed a treaty. However they did very little to act in concert with one another during the war. Each country had different goals that did not mesh well enough to force them both to come together in formulating a combined strategy. They were referred to as the Axis Powers.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Hitler's party ascended to power quickly. Before the Great Depression, the Nazis were almost unknown, receiving only 3% of the vote in elections to the Reichstag (German parliament) in 1924. The Nazis received 33% of the vote in the 1932 elections, more than almost any other party. Hitler was chosen chancellor, or head of the German government, in January 1933, and many Germans believed they had discovered a savior for their country. When he came into power, he made sure that there was enough propaganda throughout Germany so that he could have support for the upcoming wars/captures. He wanted more men to enlist in the army , since Germany's Army was shrunk by a very high amount of number, and he recreated and reintroduced the German Air Force, whose service was banned under the Treaty of Versailles after WW1. He introduced the Luftwaffe Air Squadron, which would serve in the German Navy and Air Force. This all led Germany to become stronger than ever and capture more than 30 countries/territories of occupations.
<u>Not - </u>
The reason we could also say Hitler wasn't the reason Nazis rose to power was due to Joseph Goebbels. Joseph Goebbels was crucial in the Nazis' use of propaganda to boost their appeal. In 1924, Goebbels decided to join the Nazi Party and was appointed Gauleiter of Berlin in 1926. To reach as many people as possible, Goebbels employed a combination of modern media, including as films and radio, and conventional campaigning methods, such as posters and newspapers. Through this strategy, he began to construct an image of Hitler as the strong, stable leader that Germany required to re-emerge as a great force.
<u><em>Thank You! Please Mark Brainliest! </em></u>:)
President Wilson was unable to persuade America to join the League
of Nations, because the US people don’t want to take part with the treaty
process, for they believed in independence. The democrats disparate the idea of
Wilson. He suffered from stroke and had to stop his crusade for the League.
Hamilton's next objective was to create a Bank of the United States, modeled after the Bank of England. A national bank would collect taxes, hold government funds, and make loans to the government and borrowers. One criticism directed against the bank was "unrepublican"--it would encourage speculation and corruption. The bank was also opposed on constitutional grounds. Adopting a position known as "strict constructionism," Thomas Jefferson and James Madison charged that a national bank was unconstitutional since the Constitution did not specifically give Congress the power to create a bank.
Hamilton responded to the charge that a bank was unconstitutional by formulating the doctrine of "implied powers." He argued that Congress had the power to create a bank because the Constitution granted the federal government authority to do anything "necessary and proper" to carry out its constitutional functions (in this case its fiscal duties).
In 1791, Congress passed a bill creating a national bank for a term of 20 years, leaving the question of the bank's constitutionality up to President Washington. The president reluctantly decided to sign the measure out of a conviction that a bank was necessary for the nation's financial well-being.