Answer: D. debit Supplies Expense $4,200; credit Supplies $4,200
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the adjusting entry needed at the end of the period will be to debit Supplies Expense $4,200 and credit Supplies $4,200.
The supplies expenses of $4200 was gotten as:
= $6000 - $1200
= $4800
Therefore, the correct option is D.
.
Answer:
Based on the profitability index method, the investment should not be accepted.
It does not produce enough cash flows to justify the investment.
Explanation:
The profitability index method measures the present value of benefits for by dividing the present value of benefits by the present of initial investments.
The present value of initial investment in this project remains RM400,000. The present value of incremental annual cash flows of RM80,000 after taxes for 5 years will be equal to:
RM80,000 * 3.668 = RM293,440
Then the next step is to divide the present value of benefits by the initial investment as follows:
RM293,440/RM400,000 = 0.7336 = 73.36%
The implication is that the present value of the benefits is less than the initial investment costs. The project should then be rejected.
Since it says “Double” it means you’re multiplying by 2 each time. So the answer is 8,000.
(17-18) 1,000x2=2,000
(18-19) 2,000x2=4,000
(19-20) 4,000x2=8,000
Answer:
The question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) Discriminant validity
b) Convergent validity
c) Internal validity
d) Criterion validity
And the correct answer is the option B: Convergent validity.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term known as "Convergent validity" refers to a concept used in the sociology and psichology and more other sciences who focus on the behaviors of the population with the primary goal of dealing with relation between two measures of constructs that should theorycally be related. So that means that the major purpose of this method is to prove how much relation there is between those two measurements that established to be close enough to be related. That is why that in this case Larry is checking the convergent validity so that he will see how much of the real productivity actually matches with the scores planned.
