Answer:
A) They both had the Free Exercise Clause, or the First Amendment.
B) Wisconsin v. Yoder was about kids not finishing school while Employment Division v. Smith was about doing illegal drugs in the workplace. That is why they had different holdings even though they were both for a religious purpose.
C) A member of the public that is upset about the holding in Employment Division v. Smith could have people sign petitions to pass a new law that would overturn the holding made by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
If those are the options, then your best bet for this question is
'yet'.
The other words would definitely not work in this sentence :)
You can make a table or a graph but I recommend table since it’s easy and simple
a
ok boomer easy whatever dumjy
Answer:
They now travel 18.4 miles
Explanation:
Given
Required
Determine the new distance covered
First, we need to determine the reduced distance
This is calculated as thus:
Convert % to decimal
Now, the new distance can be calculated;
<em>Hence; they now travel 18.4 miles</em>