1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pashok25 [27]
3 years ago
10

The "settlement houses" that were established in poor urban areas were designed to

History
2 answers:
zimovet [89]3 years ago
4 0

The "settlement houses" that were established in poor urban areas were designed to provides social services like daycare, education and health care for immigrants, women's and the poor.

Their main aim of settlement houses whether in Britain or in the United States is to reduce poverty and strengthen the education system.

For instance, a Hull House was a settlement house, an institution located in mainly poor and immigrant areas of major cities, which sought to assist the less fortunate through a variety of measures. In the late nineteenth century the U.S. rapidly urbanized, and settlement houses were designed to address the problems of growing cities.

kirill [66]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is D.) Provides social services like daycare, education and health care for immigrants, women's and the poor.
You might be interested in
This painting supports the idea that conquistadors were<br> motivated by
notka56 [123]

Answer:

Answer is religion

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were some ways in which the United States showed signs of isolationism after World War I
Neko [114]
The United States restricted the amount of European immigration done, they weren't participating or even a part of the League of Nations, and people were just tired of getting to foreign wars as a whole. Only 150,000 immigrants per year were allowed to immigrate to America in 1929.
4 0
3 years ago
While many nation-builders and citizens supported rights and the rule of law as a bedrock of their nations, expansion entailed t
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

While many nation-builders and citizens supported rights and the rule of law as a bedrock of their nations, expansion entailed taking away the rights of others.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Argentina used to have a military dictator who held all the power. The country now has a federal form of government. Which aspec
goldfiish [28.3K]
It is protected by the fact that it has a system of separation of powers with three branches that control each other and prevent tyrannical behavior from a single branch. They are also separated into local provinces and autonomous regions that are ruled by small scale governments that have some degree of independence and that could easily oppose a new form of tyrannical government.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was it easier for the Church to side with Galileo in 1992 than in 1633?
hodyreva [135]

In 1633 the views of people overall in sciences and the church were more constricted because what was said was obeyed. 1992 is closer to our time where scientific discoveries were expanded on and investigated, not completely ignored. The Church has been more open to other ideas while still remaining strong to the Catholic tradition in current years as opposed to the 1600s

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did western industrial nations establish spheres of influence in china rather than colonies as they did in Africa and India
    13·1 answer
  • Which central government agency was responsible to provide news on the war?
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the reason the supreme court denied suffrage
    5·1 answer
  • How did responsibilities differ between rich women and poor women in the Anicent Greece
    6·1 answer
  • Who owns a corporation but dose not have to make its dad to day decisions?
    12·1 answer
  • The Babylonian Captivity
    12·1 answer
  • What factor can limit the level of congressional pay?
    7·2 answers
  • What is Great Britain mother country named
    13·1 answer
  • Which side of the Revolutionary War had the following strengths and
    15·1 answer
  • Today, supporters of free trade defend it as the policy that best represents the public interest. Yet in the early years of the
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!