1. Too many taxes
2. No representation in Parliament
3. Trade was only allowed with Britian
4. They were left alone for so long, then Britian came back, like a parent coming back to your house after you've lived alone for so long, and you can't get rid of them.
5. They weren't being treated equally
If you want anything else, I may suggest searching it up.
Answer:
Man must accept life as it is.
Explanation:
I read that in my history textbook.
Answer:
Explanation:
The old and the new came into sharp conflict in the 1920s. While many Americans celebrated the emergence of modern technologies and less restrictive social norms, others strongly objected to the social changes of the 1920s.
In many cases, this divide was geographic as well as philosophical; city dwellers tended to embrace the cultural changes of the era, whereas those who lived in rural towns clung to traditional norms.
The Sacco and Vanzetti trial in Massachusetts and the Scopes trial in Tennessee revealed many Americans’ fears and suspicions about immigrants, radical politics, and the ways in which new scientific theories might challenge traditional Christian beliefs.
They also wanted India to have its own government, in which men like them would become MPs. The Indian National Congress first set out these ideas in 1885. ... Also, India was so valuable to Britain that they were reluctant to lose too much control. By the end of the First World War in 1918 British rule was still secure.