<span>The passage has a lot of inaccuracies. Zeus was never known as the most powerful god, he was simply king of the gods because he started the war against the Titans called the Titanomachy. Initially the Primordial gods were in power, until Gaia (first deity to ever be born) went to her children and asked them who would help her get rid of their father because she was mad he trapped their children, the Hecatonchires, in Tartarus. Only Cronus volunteered. He castrated his dad, Uranus, and then took over as king of the gods. When his wife (and sister) Rhea was pregnant with the first child, Hestia, he received a prophecy saying a son would overthrow him like he did his father. He therefore swallowed every child that Rhea bore him (including the female goddesses in case they had a son that could be the one to overthrow him). Rhea, when pregnant with Zeus, went to her mother and asked for his protection. She hid him in a cave on Crete where he was raised by a goat named Amalthea. When he was an adult, he returned to his father and used a mixture to have him throw up his siblings: Hestia, Demeter, Hera, Hades & Poseidon, all full-grown by this point. They took up home on Mt. Olympus and waged the 10-year long Titanomachy. Not all of the Titans stood by Cronus. Tethys, for example, helped Zeus. After 10-years of fighting, Zeus' uncles, the Cyclopses, made him his legendary thunderbolt which he used to free his other uncles, the Hecatonchires, from the depths of Tartarus. Using their 100 hands each (there were 3 of them), the Hecatonchires launched massive boulders at the Titans and sent them down into the depths of Tartarus, where they remained for a long time until Zeus released them. But at that point he had long been king of the gods and they settled in the background of Greek Mythology and were never really heard from again. </span>
He used repetiton and parrell structure to repet the fact of who wants what and what they demand and express that for. that effect gave his speeches a meaning and undertanding that alot of people routed for. That effect gave people that longing to follow his word and his understanding of what is happening in that time period in the world.
Explanation:
for starters, There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory, and our interests are in grave danger.
this phrase FDR used as a parrell structure.
;
HOPED this helped! please make me the brainliest please :) if u want!
Edmond's point of view in "The Count of Monte Cristo" underscores the theme of how futile revenge is. The point of view in "Sea Fever" underscores the theme that living in nature is more pleasurable than urban living.
We can arrive at this answer because:
In "The Count of Monte Cristo" we can see that Edmond maintains the point of view that someone who has suffered a crime must take revenge to find peace.
He maintains this thought throughout the narrative, but he cannot be satisfied with any result of his revenge, which reinforces the theme that revenge is something futile and meaningless.
“Sea Fever,” we can see that the speaker holds the view that the call of nature is something inevitable.
This speaker had an adventurous life when he lived amid nature, and the current life he has, in the city, is unsatisfactory because nature continues to call him.
This underscores the theme that living in nature is more pleasurable than urban living.
The point of view, in these cases, refers to the opinion of the characters.
The correct option is A. From the statement given in option A, it can be seen that the character been talked about was formerly happy but he suddenly came to himself and become sad when he remember that he did not have a nose. All that he has, that were making him happy a moment ago were completely forgotten.
Paul's teaching on the resurrection of Christians: when the last trumpet blasts and Christ returns for those who belong to Him. In that moment, all believers in Jesus, living and dead, will be transformed into the glorified, eternal bodies God has promised us and death can be defeated forever
