Answer: See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Your question isn't well written but let me help out. I saw a similar question.
Example 1: Aling Luz bought 3/8 yards of linen cloth which cost Php 72.00 per yard. She gave Php 1000.00 to the cashier.How much change will she get?
Since we are informed that Aling Luz bought 3/8 yards of linen cloth which cost Php 72.00 per yard, the amount she'll pay will be:
= 3/8 × 72
= Php 27
Since she gave the cashier Php 1000, her change will be:
= 1000 - 27
= Php 973
I think I got it. Correct me if I am wrong.
Parallelogram diagram I believe down below. We must find the height and then the area using Pythagorean theorem. Since the green shaded part is a 30-60-90 triangle, the base is 1/2 the hypotenuse, therefore it is 3. Now we calculate the height with it.
A^2 + B^2 = C^2
A^2 + 3^2 = 6^2
A^2 + 9 = 36
A^2 = 27
A = 3√3
Therefore the height is 3√3
Now calculate the area using A = bh
A = bh
= (12)(3√3)
= 36√3
So the area is 36√3 square units.
I cannot be sure of this answer because you did not provide a diagram.
What you do is divide the two numbers and then you get your answer
Multiply 2/3 into 8 1/4 and you should get 20/4 and that reduces to 10/2 but you have to simplify it more and you should get 5/1 or the answer of 5
A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.