Answer:
Change happened fast in the late 1800's. While "progress" was great for some, it also spelled the end of hundred of years of Native American tradition. It was hard to believe that the American West and East were part of the same country. The West was primarily an area of homestead farmers, miners, and cattle ranchers. While Easterners tried to make their way farther and farther west with the growth of industry and railways, Native Americans desperately clung to the hopes of maintaining their territory and tribal traditions.
Conflict between whites settlers and Native Americans had been around since the earliest settlements. Now that industry was expanding so rapidly, the fight for land brought a whole new face to these disagreements. The need for land, as well as the feeling of superiority to the Native Americans were the driving forces behind most of the policies derived in the 1870's and 1880's. The transcontinental railroad became the catalyst for much of the new conflict. Before its completion, the only Americans to venture westward had done so on horseback or covered wagon. Now thousands more could move across the much more quickly and a much less cost. In addition, what settlers also wanted the land to farm. Native Americans were increasingly pushed off their lands and forced onto reservations. The Indian Removal Act also contributed to this. At the beginning of the 1830s, Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida.
This was land that their ancestors had occupied and cultivated for generations. After this act came into effect, very few natives remained anywhere in the southeastern United States. They were pushed out West. Working on behalf of white settlers who wanted to grow cotton on the Indians' land, the federal government forced them to walk thousands of miles to a designated "Indian territory" across the Mississippi River.
Explanation:
make a conclusion I at least tried
Because Braddock hard fought his way up to the top. And that he was a everyday Irish person. Plus they knew that Baer killed a person.
btw - the way they portrayed Baer was inaccurate, he killed 1 person and he ended up compensating the family for the rest of their life.
Answer: A. State department
Explanation: The state department oversees foreign policy and issues also there is no foreign relations department.
For me it would have to be family resources because it is the most reliable <span />
Answer:
This excerpt from document two connects to when the abolition of slavery was truly beginning to happen. Buchanan was a democrat who morally was against slavery but seemed to think the Constitution protected the rights of slave owners. " Should it be refused, then the Constitution, to which all the States are parties, will have been willfully violated by one portion of them in a provision essential to the domestic security and happiness of the remainder" . Buchanan states simply that if the southeners are refused their " rights " to have slaves then the peace that Anti and Pro slavery people, will no longer exist. I am meeting the essay's requirements for contextualization because I am quoting the context directly and using the context to help inform my audience.
Explanation:
This is what I wrote. It may not be right but I'm sure it is. You may want to read over it and edit it so it sounds like you wrote it.
