I think the statement given above is false. <span>It is not very common for religious individuals to marry individuals from different religious backgrounds. Oftentimes, it would cause conflicts within the relationship. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
Emotional regulation is unequivocally moral if those who are currently struggling with emotional problems (such as depression, stress, mania, etc.) seek out emotional regulation.
<h3>What is emotional behaviour?</h3>
Emotional labor is what happens when your job demands you to act in a way that is inconsistent with your actual emotions. No matter how angry they become, a customer service representative, for instance, cannot scream at a customer making unreasonable requests.
Some reason that makes emotional regulation as an unethical behavior are-
- The morality of emotional labor is nuanced. There are also many physical and psychological repercussions for the worker.
- Long-term labor like this is linked to a number of unhealthy effects.
- The risks associated with physical work are the same since businesses urge workers to practically harm their bodies in order to achieve organizational objectives.
- The costs of emotional work are less visible but can be very high.
- On the other hand, the majority of people regularly regulate their emotions, which is important for system to survive.
- Society would collapse if we all simply went about constantly communicating to everybody around us every emotion we were feeling.
- Therefore, controlling emotions is not the issue; rather, the regularity, intensity, and duration can be.
To know more about emotional re-sponse and related behavior, here
brainly.com/question/8112542
#SPJ4
In Piaget's theory of childhood development, this demonstrates <u>egocentrism.
</u>The child is observing the world through her own eyes, according to what is happening to her. She knows that a pacifier and a rattle help her when she is sick, so she thinks the same things will help her mom get better. She is unable to realize that what is good for her may not be good for others.<u>
</u>
