Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
They traded cloth, iron, and copper in raw and worked form, and cowry shells used by the local populations as currency.
In exchange for their wares, Europeans returned textiles, carvings, spices, ivory, gum, and African slaves.
The answer is D. The Gupta empire
Answer:
Written down in Julius Caesar's Conquest of Gaul are the details of his crossing of the Rhine river by the use of a long, cleverly engineered and temporary wooden structure. Caesar crossed a several hundred foot long stretch of the river by building a bridge from thick, wooden logs tied together.
Explanation:
hope this helps
