Answer:
Why shouldn't we judge historical figures by the standards of our time?
Many of the vices we might rightfully judge a historical society or individual for are largely universal across culture and society.
We should judge them accordingly and learn from their mistakes, but we should also judge them by the degree to which that person or culture rejected those common vices and built something better. This is something quite rare and it’s far more useful as a learning tool for us to focus on this.
For example, the Greeks and Romans practiced slaveryBut so did every other ancient society. What is unique and admirable about the Greeks and Romans is the degree to which they did respect indvidual rights, seriously questioned slavery as an institution, and developed a secular, pro reason culture
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
It should have been their cunniform or way of writing, did it not give that option?
If not, it will be their Fashion sense
The Magna Carta was documented as the first paper imposed upon a King of England to limit his powers by law and protect civil rights.It has promised the protect the rights of the church, the barons from illegal imprisonment, and most importantly, access to swift justice. Answer then is D.
Richard the Lionheart was a war general
saladin launched the first successful attack
William of Tyre recorded history of the attacks
Peter the Hermit fought in the wars
