The Indian Removal Act took place in the first half of the 1800s under the presidencies of Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren and directly led to the Trail of Tears, which resulted in the death of many members of tribes in the American South. It was considered controversial because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tribes' cause wherein the state of Georgia (which was actively seeking to evict the Indian inhabitants) was told it had no right to force their removal. Nevertheless, the president ordered their removal.
hope this helps! :)
D which would be armed conflict with the Southern soldiers
Answer:
If I lived in a economy in which production, investment, prices, and incomes are determined centrally by a government it would change my life in a lot of different ways. The first way it would be different is I would be paid differently. That could have drastic consequences on my income and investments. I also might not be able to find all the commodities or goods that you would normally be able to find in a market economy. If for some reason I wanted to buy some luxury items: fancy bed, new expensive clothes and such then the state would say no because those items are not needed to survive. Therefore my life would be different in that way. all in all living in this kind of economy would become very different then my current lifestyle
Explanation:
For the other answerer if you highlight the previous answer with the mouse and then right click it the press copy you can paste it on here using ctrl v
During Clarence Gideon's trail he was forced to <span>represent himself</span>
<span>The Glorious Revolution led to the creation of the English Bill of Rights. This made England a constitutional monarchy, shifting the balance of power between the monarchy and the parliament greatly in favor of the parliament. This made Britain more democratic because a greater number of people were involved in decision making.</span>
