After a time, a Cyclops, whose name was Polyphemus<span>, returned to the cave. Leading his flock of giant sheep into the cave, he rolled a huge stone against the mouth of the cave to close the entrance. ... This time </span>Odysseus<span> spoke up, and offered the Cyclops some strong wine he had brought with him.</span>
Every sister's point of view is different. An older sister might think maturely while a younger sibling might think more naive or immaturely.
Answer:
We could change the language and adapt it to reflect the contemporary English we use nowadays. That would make the play more understandable, especially for the young people and wake up their interest for the theatre.
We could change the setting, that is, time and place of some plays and adapt it to contemporary surroundings, without changing the topic of the plays, as Shakespearean problems and inner struggles are still present in the 21st century, only in different ways.
For example, we could change characters' professions or some circumstances without changing the plot of the story. Or, perhaps, try to represent some contemporary family issues, by readapting Hamlet into a boy who is fighting against his stepfather.
Answer:
an all-knowing narrator:
<u>third-person omniscient point of view.</u>
a narrator who is a participant in the story with limited knowledge:
<u>first-person point of view.</u>
a narrator who is as a detached observer without complete knowledge:
<u>third-person limited point of view.</u>
A narrator who addresses the reader as a part of the story:
<u>second-person point of view.</u>
I just took the test and am 100% sure this is correct!
This isn't neccessarily true. Your introduction can still make sense without the hook, and the information inside the introduction part should really not directly depend on the hook to explain them, they should either be self explanatory, or you should explain them there.
Hopefully this helps!
