1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Roman55 [17]
3 years ago
9

What argument did people who opposed using the atomic bomb on Japan make to support their point of view

History
2 answers:
brilliants [131]3 years ago
8 0

The answers are 1,3,6

Amanda [17]3 years ago
6 0
There were many topics and claims in favor for the opposition party for use of the atomic bomb(s), but i'm only going to name three.

1. They said that the bomb was originally intended for the defensive, not offensive. 

2. They also claimed how it was highly illegal, since it's use of chemical weaponry was for mass destruction.

3. The use of the Atomic bomb(s) was racially motivated.
 
You might be interested in
True or false the golf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea are extensions of the Atlantic City
Fiesta28 [93]
Did you mean the atlantic ocean? if yes, then the answer is true.
3 0
3 years ago
What happens after mitosis has occurred?
maxonik [38]

Answer:

Once mitosis is complete, the entire cell divides in two by way of the process called cytokinesis.

i think

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The Republican party’s nickname is the GOP, which stands for __________.
Nady [450]

Answer:

Grand Old Party

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
why do you think the Sherman Antitrust Act and other attempts at regulating monopolies and trusts were not effective?
Vesna [10]
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
6 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me? :(
nalin [4]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

i did the best a little while ago

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the Brown v. Board of Education decision so important?
    6·1 answer
  • In the early part of the Industrial Revolution, power was provided by _____. people flowing water horses steam
    9·1 answer
  • The Protestant Reformation helped plant the seeds of democratic and federalist ideas. How did each of the concepts in the matrix
    6·1 answer
  • Congress passed the Tenure of Office Act to stop the president from removing federal officials from office without the approval
    6·1 answer
  • Which goal is most likelt to be supported by both poor and wealtgy city merchants in the early years of the frencg revolution
    10·1 answer
  • I’ll give you brainliest <br> If you give me a definition of those words in your own words.
    14·1 answer
  • The Alien and Sedition Acts:
    11·1 answer
  • How does your overpopulation affect countries in<br> terms of foreign policy?
    15·1 answer
  • Compare the emergence of advanced civilizations in Meso and South America with the four early river valley civilizations.
    13·1 answer
  • In the 1920s, how did Japan move toward greater democracy?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!