Answer:
Actually, we can benefit greatly in our personal lives and relationships from exposing ourselves to positive information. Human-interest stories increase trust and hope in humankind. Stories about improved living and health conditions are uplifting and encouraging.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. Tom was afraid, but he was sincere in his testimony.
2. He did not deny that he had any contact with Mayella, as she asked him to do favors for her.
3. He didn't deny that he was inside Mayella's house the night she was raped, but he was there to fix a door.
4. The testimony of tone contradicts that of Mayella.
5. Tom claims that Mayella held him inside the house, saying that he saved money so that the children could leave and leave them alone.
Explanation:
Tom's testimony is a tense moment in history. Firstly, because we can see Tom's nervousness and his concern in reporting what actually happened in a convincing way. Tom is sincere and narrates all the contact he had with Mayella and these interactions between them, he reinforces his own innocence and even if he shows information that contradicts Mayella's he is not absolved of the accusations.
The sentence I would choose is: "He was looking down at his outstretched hands as he talked". To me, it implies that he cannot look into the eyes of the person he is speaking to, as if he doesn't feel he is worthy.
The answer is c. courtroom : lawyer.
The original analogy, football field : head coach, is comparing a workplace to a profession that would work in that workplace. A, B, and D don't fit that description (A is comparing two similar professions, B is comparing a job with a task that person would do, and D is comparing two people) so C is your best option (it, too, follows the format of workplace : profession.)
Hope this helps!