Answer:
Terminate his employment
Explanation:
Based on the fact and information, Tibbits should be discharged from employment for his failure to disclose this relevant conviction. As a convicted offender, he is considered in the eyes of the law to be high-risk and should not be allowed to enter unsuspecting clients’ homes. It would be the company's liability if he acts non professionally and inappropriately at a jobsite.
Answer:
$ 226.04
Explanation:
Given:
Paying fund, FV = $ 30000
Interest rate, i = 2%
Time, t = 10 years
Now,
![\textup{PMT}=\textup{FV}[\frac{i}{(1+i)^n-1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctextup%7BPMT%7D%3D%5Ctextup%7BFV%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7Bi%7D%7B%281%2Bi%29%5En-1%7D%5D)
since, the payment is made monthly
thus,
n = 10 × 12 = 120 months
i = 2% / 12 = 0.02 / 12
on substituting the values in the above equation, we get
![PMT={30000}[\frac{\frac{0.02}{12}}{(1+{\frac{0.02}{12}})^{120}-1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PMT%3D%7B30000%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.02%7D%7B12%7D%7D%7B%281%2B%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.02%7D%7B12%7D%7D%29%5E%7B120%7D-1%7D%5D)
or
PMT = $ 226.04
Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Harrison Enterprises currently produces 8,000 units of part B13.
Current unit costs for part B13 are as follows:
Direct materials $12
Direct labor 9
Factory rent 7
Administrative costs 10
General factory overhead (allocated) 7
Total $45
If Harrison decides to buy part B13, 50% of the administrative costs would be avoided.
To calculate whether it is better to make the par in-house or buy, we need to determine which costs are unavoidable.
Unavoidable costs:
Factory rent= 7
Administrative costs= 5
General factory overhead= 7
Total= 17
Now, we can calculate the unitary cost of making the product in-house:
Unitary cost= direct material + direct labor + avoidable administrative costs
Unitary cost= 7 + 5 + 5= $17
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Answer:
The arbitrageur should borrow money at 4% per annum since it is cheaper than paying the forward price for delivery
Explanation:
Current price of gold=$1,400 per ounce
Forward price=$1,500
The arbitrageur can either pay the forward price or borrow $1400 and pay the interest of 4% in a year. Consider option 1 paying the forward price of 1500
Option 1
Since there are no additional costs, the total cost for buying the gold=forward price=$1,500
Option 2
If the arbitrageur borrows the 1400 to pay for the gold now, then pay the interest in 1 year;
The total cost=Amount borrowed+interest accrued in 1 year
Total cost=1400+(4%×1400)
1400+((4/100)×1400)
1400+56=$1456
Since there are no additional costs, option 2=$1456
If we compare option 1 to option 2, we notice that option 2 is slightly cheaper than option 1 by $44
(Option 1-Option 2)=(1500-1456)=$44
The arbitrageur should borrow money at 4% per annum since it is cheaper than paying the forward price for delivery
Answer:
$205,000
Explanation:
Total liabilities=current liabilities+long-term liabilities
total liabilities=$150,000+$220,000
total liabilities=$370,000
total owners'equity plus liabilities=$320,000+$370,000=$690,000
long-term assets+current assets=liabilities+owners'equity
long-term assets=$485,000
current assets are unknown
liabilities+owners'equity=$690,000
let CA represent current assets
$485,000+CA=$690,000
CA=$690,000-$485,000
CA=$205,000
