Answer:
an offer and an acceptance
Explanation:
Here, in this particular case, the valid contract will require an agreement i.e. an offer and an acceptance which is further backed personally by the legally adequate consideration that is made by the individuals or groups that tend to have legal competence to embark into a contract, and thus the legal ambition.
a) Yes, $67 exceeds the loss—minimizing output.
Using the MR
They will produce 9 units.
Profits per unit = $67 - $50 = $17
Total profit =
$153.
(b) Yes, $42 exceeds the loss—minimizing output.
Using the MR
They will produce 6 units
Loss per unit is = $42 - $47.50 = $5.50
Total loss = $33 (= 6 x $5.50), which is less than the total fixed cost of $60.
c) No, because $33 is less than AVC. If it did produce, the quantity will be 4—By producing 4 units, it would lose $78 [= 4 ($33 - $52.50)]. and if they didn't produce, it would lose only the total fixed cost of $60.
All of these fall under the Bottleneck items of strategic sourcing.
Bottleneck explains situations when there is a high amount of risk and the availability of the item is low. There are not a lot of supplies to pick from but the item is in demand, this leads to procurement problems. Companies use strategic sourcing to try and red the cost of an item while keeping or improving the quality of it.
Answer:
The correct answer that a dividend is a better choice is . a. Regarding taxes, which would benefit Aleshia the most? The $114,000 dividend because after taxes she would have $ from the dividend and $ 86,640 from the bonus.
Explanation:
A dividend is a payment made by a corporation to its shareholders, usually as a distribution of profits. When a corporation earns a profit or surplus, the corporation is able to re-invest the profit in the business and pay a proportion of the profit as a dividend to shareholders.
A tax (from the Latin taxo) is a compulsory financial charge or some other type of levy imposed upon a taxpayer (an individual or legal entity) by a governmental organization in order to fund various public expenditures. A failure to pay, along with evasion of or resistance to taxation, is punishable by law.
Answer:
d.mitigating
Explanation:
This is a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor is a fact of relevance as it can reveal the motivations of the crime. Although not sufficient to absorb the defendant, except in cases of self-defense, when there is evidence of mitigating factors, this can be used to soften a defendant's penalty if it is proven that the motive for the crime was not misleading. A good example is the case in which the defendant committed a murder, and he was sentenced to death, but there is a mitigating factor: the defendant suffered physical abuse for years and killed his attacker. The jury can understand that the defendant committed the crime due to the suffering caused by the victim, which would be different from a crime motivated by trite motives. Thus, the death penalty can be understood as disproportionate and it can be reversed to a less severe penalty.
