Answer: railroads were built with assistance from the federal government through land grants.
Explanation:
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
Answer:11.Analyzing Primary Sources What reasons are given for the issuing of this edict? The reasons for issuing the Edict of Milan was that so people are treated equally, and that since people are allowed to believe in their own religion, they believed that Christians should be allowed to believe in their own religion.12.Drawing Conclusions Why do you think property was restored to the Christians and to their churches?Property was restored to the Christians and their churches because they previously own that land, but was persecuted and forced out of that area, taking away any property that belong to them.13.Identifying Perspectives, The Edict of Milan only guarantees tolerance of Christianity, not recognition by the state. Why did Constantine and Licinius take this position?The reason why Constantine and Licinius took the position to tolerate Christians is because it was unfair for people who believe in Christianity to be treated differently from their religion when they allow people to practicetheir own.14.ComparingHow does the edict’s position on religion compare with a political ideal or contemporary event?The edict’s position on religion compares with a political ideal because many politicians speak about freedom of religion and worship and allows people to pursue their own.
Explanation:because i said
