People feared the banks would close, which would result in losing all their money. This was around the Great Depression era. A lot of banks were closing because people were withdrawing there assets before they lost it all.
The most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio Diaz’s rule is because He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is Diaz’s rule?</h3>
Generally, During the president of Porfirio Daz (1876–80; 1884–1911), Mexico witnessed considerable development but political rights were constrained and the free press was muzzled. This era is known as the Porfiriato.
In conclusion, The fact that Porfirio Diaz restricted citizens' freedoms while boosting foreign investment and improving infrastructure is the most likely source of the mixed opinions that Mexicans held of his leadership.
Read more about Diaz’s rule
brainly.com/question/774392
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In judging whether this is fair handling of the case, ask:
A. Is it fair to Eddie?
Youngsters have to learn to be responsible for their life. They know that for every action there is a consequence. In this case, it is the third time that this happened. So it is not new for him, and he really knew what he was entering. So he got what he deserves.
B. Is it fair to Best Buy?
Best Buy is a serious company with a good reputation in the market. It has to follow rules and regulations and respect the law. Eddie is a criminal and there are procedures to be followed.
C. Is it fair to society?
I think this is not a matter of fairness, but to obey the law that is the same to all. This application of the law allows people to live in harmony in society. Otherwise, everybody would act according to their interests and advantages.
D. Is it in the best interest of society to punish Eddie severely?
It is in the best interest of society to punish Eddie to give a clear message. It's the law. You have to obey it, otherwise, there would be chaos in society. Furthermore, it was not the first time Eddie committed a crime, it is the third time. He had his chances to improve his conduct and learn his lessons. He decided otherwise. And as I said, for every action there is a consequence.
The appropriate response is Ethnocentrism, drive out European colonialism. Unmistakably the essential main impetus for the Imperialism in Europe was ethnocentrism and not the prudent advantages the Europeans were making. Ethnocentrism is judging another culture exclusively by the qualities and measures of one's own way of life. Ethnocentric people judge different gatherings in respect to their own ethnic gathering or culture, particularly with worry for dialect, conduct, traditions, and religion.
Probably he or she meant like how he ran his government or how he basically ruled his country.
