Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes because the King agreed to meet with some of the women and promised to distribute all the bread in Versailles to the crowd.
They were demanding bread for their families, after the march the king agreed to distribute bread to the crowd.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The reasons why Napoleon might have had for selling the Louisiana Territory to the United States could have been the following.
Experts agree on two basic reasons for French Emperor Napoleon decided to sell the huge Louisiana territory to the United States. The first reason, France needed a lot of money. It had deep debts as a result of many wars. Secondly, the Lousiana territory was immense and was too far away from France, so it was very difficult to defend.
These circumstances were an advantage to President Thomas Jefferson, who sent James Madison to help Robert Livingston (the Minister to France) in order to accelerate the negotiations to close the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.
<span>The
expansion of the Ottoman empire,in particular their capture of
Constantinople in 1453,cut off Europe from traditional overland trade
routes east.This meant these land routes had to bypassed if Europeans
were to get the spices,silk,and other Eastern trade goods they
needed,and the only way to do this was by sea. Hope that helps</span>
Answer:
Migrants eventually induce social, economic, and political problems in receiving countries, including
1) increases in the population, with adverse effects on existing social institutions;
2) increases in demand for goods and services;
3) displacement of nationals from occupations in the countryside and in the cities;
4) increases in the size of the informal sector of the national economy;
5) deterioration in the salary structures of the informal, rural, and urban sectors of the economy;
6) transculturation;
7) occasional loss of customs and traditions by the local population; and
8) the introduction of diseases and social problems. The receiving countries do benefit from the infusion of skills.
<span>“Taxation without representation is <span>tyranny.” or </span></span>"no taxation without representation"
I would have to go with A.
