No
Oh
And
I’m just doing this so I can
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Economic stimulus refers to change in monetary or fiscal policies by the Federal Reserve with growth as an objective. One of the ways of implementing economic stimulus is lowering of interest rates by the Fed.
Lowering of interest rates by the Fed would have an effect on loans availed by the public. The quantity of loanable funds shall increase which would lead to lowering of interest rates charged by the banks.
In the given case, Nick stands to gain in the sense he can avail car loan at a lower rate of interest than currently offered, if he waits for Fed to implement it's new policies.
Thus, the given statement is true.
Answer: $12,113.14
Explanation:
Find out the future value of each payment 20 years from now then sum up the values.
Year 1:
= 250 * ( 1 + 15%)¹⁹
= $3,557.94
Year 2:
= 300 * ( 1 + 15%)¹⁸
= $3,712.636
Year 3:
= 450 * ( 1 + 15%)¹⁷
= $4,842.5688
Future value of all:
= 3,557.94 + 3,712.636 + 4,842.5688
= $12,113.14
Answer (A):
Need more data to select the better adviser
<u>Explanation: </u>
Adviser A averaged 19% return on the investment which is more than that of Adviser B who averaged 16% return on investment. However, adviser A has a beta of 1.5 which is also greater than that of Adviser B who has a beta of 1. This means that adviser A made a more riskier investment and hence a higher average return on investment. We need more data to tell which adviser performed better in relation to each other.
Answer (B):
Investment Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
= T-bill rate = 6%
= Market return = 14%
= Market risk premium = 14% - 6% = 8%
= Average Return by Adviser A =19%
= Beta of Adviser A = 1.5
= Average Return by Adviser B =16%
= Beta of Adviser B = 1
CAPM Equation is 
<u>For Adviser A</u>
= 6 + 1.5 (14 - 6) = 18%
The expected average return for the investment is 18% which means that Adviser A over performed the market by 1 %
<u>For Adviser B</u>
= 6 + 1 (14 - 6) = 14%
The expected average return for the investment is 14% which means that the Adviser B over performed the market by 2 %
Clearly, Adviser B performed better than Adviser A.
Answer (C):
Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u />
In this part, the
and 
All else remains the same
We make similar calculation as in part B
Viable strategic options companies should consider in tailoring their strategy to fit circumstances of emerging country markets include all of the following, EXCEPT <em>staying away from those emerging markets where it is impractical to modify the company's business model to accommodate local circumstances.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Staying away from those emerging markets where it is impractical to modify the the company's business model to accommodate local circumstances</em> is not the best because in the long run the institution will be forced to conform with their business model which could change their mission and activities entirely. Therefore it should work on how it can please the market in a way so it can feed it at least.
#learnwithbrainly