1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
earnstyle [38]
3 years ago
11

African slavery began in the Americas in the 1500s when____________________ began bringing Africans to their colonies in the New

World to replace Native American slaves who had died from diseases. *Answer only if you know please*
A) England
B) France
C) Spain and Portugal
D) England and Spain
History
2 answers:
Arisa [49]3 years ago
8 0

ANSWER IS C.

SPAIN & PORTUGAL

zavuch27 [327]3 years ago
3 0
<span>African slavery began in the Americas in the 1500s when Spain and Portugal began bringing Africans to their colonies in the New World to replace Native American slaves who had died from diseases. </span>
You might be interested in
According to Communist Manifesto (1848): how are the predictions of Marx accurate and inaccurate?
gavmur [86]

The Communist Manifesto, first published in 1848 for the Communist League, had little influence in its own day. Only after Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' other writings had made their views on socialism widely known did it become a standard text. For about a century it was one of the most widely read (and some would argue misread) documents in the world.

But why study it today? Most of the communist world has collapsed. Nominally communist countries like Vietnam and China are busily building market economies in defiance of everything Marx advocated, and Korea and Cuba are barely surviving, serving as models for no one. Has not Marxism been relegated to the ash-heap of history?

There are several reasons why The Communist Manifesto is still an important document. As a historically significant work, it has a certain intrinsic interest. It is good to know what the great ideas are which have shaped history. Some people would argue that Marxists so thoroughly betrayed Marxism that the document can be used to show why attempts at building communist states failed: they were never truly Marxist at all. If true Marxism has never been tried, then it might be worth reconsidering afresh. Or if, as others argue, Marxism has intrinsic flaws that doomed it from the beginning, we might hope to discover traces of them here which might teach us why Marxism should be shunned. The goal here is not to convert you, but to help you explore Marx's writing from his point of view, so that you can understand his actual meaning while still maintaining a stance that can allow you to think critically about the subject and form your own opinions.

It is important to understand that Marx played two important roles in world history: as a critic of capitalism and as an advocate of socialism. He actually wrote very little on the latter subject. Although a strong believer in the importance of building socialism, he spent most of his time and energy on a subtle and complex critique of the capitalist system. This critique is still very influential on many historians, art and literature scholars, sociologists and others. There have been many neo-Marxisms which have been based more or less loosely on the original ideas of Marx and which are widely discussed today. Whether you want to explore such ideas or combat them, it's good to have some notion of the subject.

A manifesto is a document which proclaims publicly--or makes manifest-- the central ideas of a group or individual. Although the organization for which this one was written was underground (for the simple reason that it was illegal) Marx always envisioned the socialist movement as open. He rejected secret conspiracies because his ideal of building socialism was envisioned as a majority enterprise which could only accumulate the necessary momentum through an open, broadly-based campaign of education and exhortation.

Engels was Marx's close collaborator and an important thinker and writer in his own right. He outlived Marx by many years, and produced several volumes which are still influential. Marx was clearly the more powerful thinker of the two, but Engels was the better stylist. Although Engels may have been responsible for much of the eloquent writing in the Manifesto, because it incorporates Marx's ideas and embodies some central concepts of what came to be known as Marxism the following questions will refer to the authors simply as "Marx."






3 0
3 years ago
Most Roman slaves were __________. A. single women B. poor peasants C. Roman criminals D. conquered people
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Just did the assignment on ED2020

6 0
3 years ago
How did porcelain change life in europe
malfutka [58]
The europeans could build more expensive things to sell in life
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following did Austria-Hungary demand of Serbia in its ultimatum? an end to all anti-Austrian agitation and punishme
UNO [17]

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy were in an alliance together known as the Triple Alliance. This was an agreement between the empires to provide support to each other in case of a Russian declaration of war against them. Serbia was an ally to Russia and so Austria felt that the Serbians helped the Bosnians carry out the assassination. Ferdinand's uncle was emperor of Austria at the time and felt that this was a direct attack on their country. When he went to Kaiser Otto von Bismarck of Germany, Germany agreed to intervene against any Russian threats or threats from their allies. In this case, Germany gave Austria permission to send demands to Serbia to repay them, which they refused to comply with. At the same time, Russia was gathering their army to come to Serbia's aid, which Austria also saw as a direct threat and declared war on Serbia. This culminated in World War I.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What event angered Timothy McVeigh so much that he decided to bomb a government building in Oklahoma City in 1995?
tankabanditka [31]
The standoff and ensuing tragedy at the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, TX in 1993 angered Timothy McVeigh so much that he decided to bomd a government building in Oklahoma City in 1995. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "A".
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Have any one read the book Frindle by andrew clemets
    11·1 answer
  • How did social hierarchies in societies that arose during and after the Neolithic differ from
    15·1 answer
  • Why do we use DBQs to study history?
    14·2 answers
  • Mr. Paley argued that watches and the universe both must have ______ .
    9·1 answer
  • What is special about the tale of genji and why it is is important record of court life at this time?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain how a unitary system of government differs from a federal system.
    10·1 answer
  • Why might the Atlantic Ocean have appeared to shrink in the late 1930s?
    15·1 answer
  • Select the two houses of England's Parliament. Senate House of Lords House of Commons House of Representatives Knesset
    9·2 answers
  • Describe how learning history is essential for good citizenship. Cite at least two sources after your answer.
    11·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Forrest Reservation Act?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!