The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Answer:
Hiram Rhodes Revels
Explanation:
Hiram Rhodes Revels was the first African American elected to a full term in the Senate.
It would be an asteroid. Let me tell you this a comet has a lot of dust not rocks. A small star has no rocks! Therefore, it is an asteroid since it is rocky and smaller than a planet.
Answer:
Anoka, Minnesota
Explanation:
Anoka, Minnesota, calls itself the "Halloween Capital of the World," as it is one of the first cities in the United States to put on a Halloween celebration that discourages people from playing tricks or causing trouble.
Answer:
<em>D) Advances in education and human services</em>
<em></em>
<u><em>Please mark brainliest!</em></u>
<u><em>Hope this helps!:</em></u>