1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following had some power to limit the authority of the monarch in pre-Columbian Mexican civilization?

History
2 answers:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer is option A.

Explanation:

This is a precarious inquiry, on the grounds that there was no legal council or city lawmaking body in pre-Columbian Mexican progress. The tyrant would be the ruler progressed toward becoming autoritharistic. So I would state the general population had some capacity to confine the expert of the ruler. I don't recollect of any case in which the revolt of the general population oust the tlatoani, the Aztec specialist, yet they betrayed tlatoani Moctezuma, joined the Spanish victors and crushed the Aztec domain.

cestrela7 [59]3 years ago
3 0

This is a tricky question, because there was no judicial tribunal or city legislature in pre-Columbian Mexican civilization. The despot would be the monarch became autoritharistic. So I would say the people had some power to limit the authority of the monarch. I don't remember of any case in which the revolt of the people overthrow the <em>tlatoani</em>, the Aztec authority, but they did betray <em>tlatoani</em> Moctezuma, joined the Spanish conquerors and defeated the Aztec empire.

You might be interested in
How can the government reduce the wealth gap in a mixed market economy? The government can control income levels by placing limi
STatiana [176]
I believe the answer is C. I know for sure it is not A or B.

I hope my answer helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was not a reason Johnson used when vetoing the extension of the Freedmen's Bureau and the Civil Rights Bill of 1866?. A) J
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer;

D. Johnson said the rights and guarantees of the Emancipation Proclamation were sufficient to protect blacks civil rights and a new bill was unnecessary.


Explanation;

The Freedmen's Bureau provided food, housing and medical aid, established schools and offered legal assistance. It was vetoed by president Andrew Johnson on February 19, 1866, and the congress failed to override that veto on the following day.

It also attempted to settle former slaves on land confiscated or abandoned during the war

6 0
3 years ago
Early on in history, what type of people could vote?
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

In the early history of the U.S., some states allowed only white male adult property owners to vote, while others either did not specify race, or specifically protected the rights of men of any race to vote. Freed slaves could vote in four states. Women were largely prohibited from voting, as were men without property.

8 0
2 years ago
I need help with this history
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

Richard Nixon

Explanation:

Do you believe everyone deserves to be offered the right choices? If so, Universal healthcare is a big choice that many wonder if it's the right one or not. Universal healthcare has both sides to it's major choice. An example is either healthcare lowers overall cost or it overwhelms the governments budgets. There are many facts that support both sides and make the decision arduous. As choosing the right side, healthcare should be adopted because everyone deserves to stay healthy and get the care they need. People will make their choice but really, was it the right decision?

A reason why Universal healthcare should be adopted is that it helps people when they need the help, financially. To better understand the situation, most people can't afford health care coverage. That's where universal health care comes in. Healthcare does plenty for people such as, lower administrative costs, prevent future social costs, creates a healthier workforce, and much more. In the article, "Healthcare for Everyone" by Common Dreams, it states that "Roughly 30 million people, 9% of the U.S. population, are uninsured. Another 26%, 86 million people, are underinsured, they have insurance but are unable to access medical care because their deductibles or copays are prohibitively high." Let's look at one example, many can't afford their own care due to immense prices. In 2018 the average spent ,for healthcare, per person was about 11,000! Which is why Universal Healthcare should be adopted for many people to save money, and stay healthy.

Another reason why Universal healthcare should be open to all is a cleaner workforce. A cleaner workforce would lead to healthier people which leads to less people coming in for care. Healthcare leads to a cleaner workforce by giving people the care they need. Many citizens can't afford care so their only choice is to stay sick and hope it goes away. This leads to getting more people sick and sick until it's a big unhealthy workforce. So when given the opportunity to be healthy citizens will take it and protect themselves and their families. And in all they save money. So, Why wouldn't a struggling citizen want a better workforce and health.

People who disagree may claim that, Universal

healthcare would also entail large-scale job loses for roughly two million people employed in the healthcare system. A possible concern that may raise is that, with the amount of so many unemployed, it would make it difficult to help the unemployed. They would have trouble finding jobs and making money to spend on simple necessities. This could be possible because once universal healthcare is adopted there won't be as many doctors needed. The evidence, however, overwhelmingly supports my argument that universal healthcare could also create jobs.

When considering the issue of whether healthcare should be adopted or not, it is clear that Universal health care should be for everyone. Universal health care can change lives and so can 

you. We all need to support Universal Healthcare and fight for our rights. We all deserve to stay healthy and get the care we need.

4 0
2 years ago
Analyize declaration of independence
dexar [7]
Ratified on July 4, 1776, The Declaration of Independence effectively formed the United States of America. It was signed by 56 delegates to the Continental Congress, and outlined both the philosophical and tangible reasons for becoming independent from Great Britain. The document contains a lot of meaning that I want to go over in-depth, and give history and meaning to each part.

While the document is not formally divided, it is divided into the five unofficial sections below, from the Introduction to the Conclusion. And as much as I would like to include the full text along with this analysis, doing so would make for a cluttered and hard-to-read hub, and so I'll try to include as much as a I can with
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone please help me
    11·1 answer
  • Conflicts over religious differences and oil supplies in the Middle East
    13·2 answers
  • What did william penn believe deeply in
    8·2 answers
  • List 5 general powers of congress
    11·1 answer
  • How did democratic traditions emerge in the american colonies
    7·1 answer
  • This is nothing related to school.... sort of, but anyways i got in trouble for apparently "Making out" in the locker rooms thei
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Columbian exchange affect Asia?
    5·1 answer
  • Find an example of the Rule of Law
    8·2 answers
  • Who were the first four caliphs of islam
    15·2 answers
  • how did the knights of labor increase their membership from 100,000 to 700,000 in the early 1880s? quizlet
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!