According to the excerpt, it can be inferred that the sentence that supports the idea that sugar was more than just a killer in Louisiana is option 4. "people needed..."
<h3>What does the word Killer mean in the snippet?</h3>
According to the context described in the fragment, reference is made to the fact that sugar in Louisiana was affected by the weather, so the slaves were required to perform faster at the rate of the mills to prevent the crop from being damaged with the cold.
From the above, it can be inferred that this characteristic of the climate and the cultivation of sugar was a difficulty for the lives of the slaves who had to demand too much of themselves to work at full speed.
Note: This question is incomplete because the question and the options are missing. Here is the complete information:
Which line from the passage best provides evidence to support the claim that sugar was more of "a killer" in Louisiana than in the Caribbean?
- "In every single American slave state, the population of enslaved people kept rising. . . ."
- ". . . enough enslaved children were born, lived, and grew to become adults."
- "not only did the slave states need to harvest the cane in perfect rhythm with the grinding mills. . . ."
- "people needed to work faster than the weather. . . ."
Learn more about fragment in: brainly.com/question/10596402
#SPJ1
Answer:People are horrible at keeping secrets. As in, really, really bad at it (no matter what anyone may tell you to the contrary). And you know what? We’re right to be. Just like the two Rhesus Macaques in the picture above, we have an urge to spill the beans when we know we shouldn’t—and that urge is a remarkably healthy one. Resist it, and you may find yourself in worse shape than you’d bargained for. And the secreter the secret, the worse the backlash on your psyche will likely be.
I never much cared for Nathaniel Hawthorne. I first dreaded him when my older sister came home with a miserable face and a 100-pound version of The House of the Seven Gables. I felt my anxiety mount when she declared the same hefty tome unreadable and said she would rather fail the test than finish the slog. And I had a near panic attack when I, now in high school myself, was handed my own first copy of the dreaded Mr. H.
Now, I’ve never been one to judge books by size. I read War and Peace cover to cover long before Hawthorne crossed my path and finished A Tale of Two Cities (in that same high school classroom) in no time flat. But it was something about him that just didn’t sit right. With trepidation bordering on the kind of dread I’d only ever felt when staring down a snake that I had mistaken for a tree branch, I flipped open the cover.
Luckily for me, what I found sitting on my desk in tenth grade was not my sister’s old nemesis but The Scarlet Letter. And you know what? I survived. It’s not that the book became a favorite. It didn’t. And it’s not that I began to judge Hawthorne less harshly. After trying my hand at Seven Gables—I just couldn’t stay away, could I; I think it was forcibly foisted on all Massachusetts school children, since the house in question was only a short field trip away—I couldn’t. And it’s not that I changed my mind about the writing—actually, having reread parts now to write this column, I’m surprised that I managed to finish at all (sincere apologies to all Hawthorne fans). I didn’t.
But despite everything, The Scarlet Letter gets one thing so incredibly right that it almost—almost—makes up for everything it gets wrong: it’s not healthy to keep a secret.
I remember how struck I was when I finally understood the story behind the letter – and how shocked at the incredibly physical toll that keeping it secret took on the fair Reverend Dimmesdale. It seemed somehow almost too much. A secret couldn’t actually do that to someone, could it?
Explanation:
Answer:
Paragraph 7 contributes to the development of ideas in the text by concluding them.
Explanation:
Conclusion has the role of finishing the thought process in the text, this way, paragraph 7 can contribute to the text's cohesion by bringing it to a conclusion of ideas, and present the final proposal.
Answer:
MAKE NO CHANGE
Explanation:
There is nothing wrong with the punctuation of the sentence we are analyzing here. First, let's take a look at the colon. When we need to introduce a long list of items, a colon should be used right before the list begins. That is exactly what we have here. The speaker placed a colon before listing the locations to be visited.
Now, we can usually separate the items in a list with commas. However, in this case, not only do we have long names for each location, but we also have the "location of the location". That is, a certain museum is located in a certain city, and to separate the name of the museum from the name of the city, we must use a comma already. For that reason, when we name another location, a different one, we should use a semicolon instead of a comma.
