Answer:
It is departmentalized in a functional way
Explanation:
Functional departmentalization is the type of organizational structure based on common job functions. In Mitchell's case all similar jobs, like legal or marketing, are grouped in one place or on the same floor. This type of organization provides space for further employee's specialization by putting staff in places where their skills can further develop.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The highest mountain could fit into the deepest ocean basin.
Answer:
$0.20 or 20 cents for every dollar invested as assets
Explanation:
To determine how many dollars (or cents) of net income did Walk Co. generate for every dollar of assets invested we have to;
divide Walk Co.'s net income by its total assets = $40,000 / $200,000 = $0.20 or 20 cents. This is called the
<span>Lost profits are consequential damages. Haddad is right that a buyer may not recover consequential damages that it could have prevented by cover. But Jewell-Rung offered legitimate reasons for not covering: the only Lakeland garments now available to it were those made by Olympic. Olympic would not sell a competitor the garments at reasonable prices. Further, Jewell-Rung could not rely on the quality of the garments manufactured by a different company. Jewell-Rung's failure to cover was reasonable and the company was entitled to prove its lost profits. Jewell-Rung Agency, Inc. v. Haddad Organization, Ltd</span>
Answer:
1350
Explanation:
(300 x 0.70) + (300 x 0.80) + (300 x 26)
= 210+240+7800
=8250
8250- (300 x 23)
8250-6900 = $1350
Therefore his total return for this investment is 1350
