B- a lot of slaves back then tried to escape their lives of entrapment and being owned by other human beings,so they would attempt to make their way to the North where slavery was not accepted or used. If slaves made it north they would have lived their lives as free people,but if they were caught they were usually beaten or killed to make an example to show other slaves what would happen if they ran away.
Answer:
Jean Baptist Lamarck
Explanation:
Charles Darwin was influenced by the most popular theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics, believes of time concepts in organic changes and its influences on animals, theoretical framework of organic evaluations. Although the ideas of Lamarck was not as is accepted by few scientists of his time but Charles see the lightening power of theories of him.
Some of the social pros and cons of the Transatlantic Slave trade include:
Social pros:
- Intermingling of cultures.
- Exposure of cultures to other cultures.
Social cons:
- Unequal treatment of certain cultures.
- Conflict
<h3>What were some social cons and pros of the slave trade?</h3>
The Transatlantic Slave trade led to Africans being able to interact with Europeans, Native Americans, and other African tribes they didn't know existed. This then led to an intermingling of cultures in what was one of the earliest forms of globalization.
The social cons outweighed the pros however as the intermingling led to the unequal treatment of cultures. For instance, Africans were looked down upon and their cultures were labeled as witchcraft. Conflict also arose between cultures due to the superiority complex.
Find out more on the cons of Transatlantic Slave trade at brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ1
I discovered that a key moment in Roman history was a very little-discussed raid by pirates on the Port of Rome at Ostia.
Rome was at that point the dominant world superpower, and there was no state in the world that would ever have dared to attack Rome. But the Romans were attacked by a group of stateless desperados who set fire to the Port. The flames may well have been visible in Rome itself. And this sent a shockwave through Rome, because if pirates could strike that close to the imperial capital, nowhere was safe.
And in this panicky atmosphere - an atmosphere of panic, I might say, which was deliberately whipped up by ambitious politicians - the Roman people took a series of fatal steps, surrendering some of their liberties and some of their control over their government. And in doing so, they sewed the seeds of the destruction of their own democracy.
And the more I looked at that event, the more it seemed familiar to me and the parallel with 9/11 - and in particular the response to it.
