Answer:
"$10,000" is the appropriate solution.
Explanation:
According to the question, the values are:
Future cash flows,
= $2,10,000
Amortization Cost,
= $2,20,000
Now,
The loss amount will be:
= 
On substituting the given values, we get
= 
= 
Answer:
C)
In order to use the Cost-Benefit Principle correctly we need to compare the marginal benefit of the new spending, which is $25 million, with the marginal cost of the new spending, which is $50 million. This new spending makes no economic sense.
Explanation:
The cost-benefit principle in accounting states that the additional benefit must outweigh additional cost in an accounting system.
Spending of $250 million is giving $400 million revenue. The new proposal of spending $300 million to get $425 million implies we are spending extra $50 million to make extra $25 million.
This is not a good investment according to the cost-benefit principle.
Answer:
The theme is very complex, however a short explanation of that type of distribution is given below with and example.
Explanation:
To begin with, that distribution of variables will totally depend on the type of product that is being under study. Having that in mind, the distribution to the advertising will be more or less strong on the consumer's attention depending on the day. Therefore that, for example, if the case is about an alcoholic drink or something related to the weekends like clothes for going out or something like that, then the advertising will cause more impact in the consumer on fridays and saturdays and that will be like that because the consumer will now be exposed to the possible situation of going out that exact night so he or she might want to consumer an alcoholic drink.
It will be the same with the hours of every day, if the advertising is shown late at night but before party time, then the consumers will be exposed to that commercial and will the necessity of buying, psychologically speaking.
B- interior designer !!! Being able to design is an import part in showing off your creative side :) hope this helps
True. Fixed cost per unit is inversely proportional to the volume of units produced.
Fixed costs per unit are inversely proportional to the volume produced because depending on the amount of units made, the amount spent on fixed costs is then based. Because they are related to one another, this statement is true.