If Lyle is concerned about the difference between a company's salaries for its white workers and its Colombian workers, he can place economic pressure on the company by convincing a large number of consumers not to do business with the company by highlighting his findings and creating negative publicity. This strategy is also known as a “boycott”.
If Lyle is a worker for this company he could also, on his own or with assistance from his coworkers, place economic pressure on the company by going on strike citing payment inequalities due to race and/or suing the company.
Answer:
75%
Explanation:
This result is taken from a study led by Robert Plomin using twins as the main test subjects. This indicates that it is true that intelligence can be influenced by environment and genetical factors , but genetical factors since play a larger part.
Highly intelligence people tend to have the abiltiy to process new information at a much faster rate compared to normal people and have a naturally larger brain capacity to store that information longer. This basic ability cannot be replicated with training or nutrition.
If values are abstract cultural beliefs, then norms are how they are put into play.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
The average American can get sick 1 or 2 times a year.
Hope it helps!
