<span>The</span> War Powers Resolution of 1973 may be U.S. federal law providing that the President will send U.S. defense force into action abroad solely<span> by authorization of Congress or if </span>u.s. is already under fire or serious threat. The War Powers Resolution needs that the president apprize Congress inside forty-eight hours of committing defense force to action<span> forbids </span>defense forces from remaining for over sixty days while not an authorization of the employment of force or a declaration of war.
"excavating Earth’s surface to reach veins of clean coal" would be the best option because this is done fairly close to the top of the Earth's surface. It's a controversial and dangerous practice.
Here we go..
These questions deal with opinion and perspective supplied by facts, so if this is purely academic there is no perfect answer. In my opinion, yes imperial rule has always been bad. There are positive things about empires, that is what makes them interesting. There are pros and cons, but often that not (speaking in both modern and recent times) the pros are supposed to blot out the cons. The Roman Empire is an ancient example, so yeah those pros weren't mean to blot out the cons. Never forget this, most pros of the imperial government are to make 'managing' easier. If the people dont want to be ruled by a foreign power, then youll get what you always have. Riots and whatnot. Ha, flip open any area of a text book and youll find the answer to "What is a lot or half the people dont want the imperialism?" Listen, there is no such thing as a completely good anything. But also, never let that be an excuse for injustice. Whether or not you judge yours or someone elses empire as good depends on you really, how you feel what you want, your morals. And if you want specific examples - I have plenty. But I am tired of typing now so if you want examples just msg me. Hope I helped
They can help because although they all do things a bit different from each other it all works out. As an example Roosevelt was a republican but he was also a progressive and so he leaned to a more democratic view but when he handed his job to Taft who was full on republican, even though he changed a few things he still developed.
