I believe you are talking about when the US was discussing whether they should have equal representation in the legislative house or unequal representation based on population density. The small states would have been happy with equal representation because that would mean their state interests would not be overruled by larger state populations, such as Virginia (back then, Virginia had a lot of people :P). Larger states would have been more happy with unequal representation based on population density because they thought it was unfair to have smaller states be equally represented when they have more people being represented in the house. IN the end, the compromise was the House of Representatives and the Senate in the legislative branch of the government. The HoR had unequal representation based on population density and the Senate had equal representation from each state.
Answer:
Texas During the Civil War: Texas contributed 135 officers to the Confederate army as well as a huge amount of military supplies and provisions. Civil War: Sacrifice, Valor, and Hope: Gov. Sam Houston lost his office when he refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy.
Answer:
The USA were more so ideologically driven by 1945.
Explanation:
In 1939, the USA and USSR, alongside other powers (ie. Great Britain), were united against a common enemy: Adolf Hitler. This incentivised all countries to put their differences aside and unite against Hitler, in order to end the rule of one of the largest threats of the 20th century. Thus, in 1939, the USA were largely cooperative and cordial.
By 1945, once Hitler and the Nazis’ rule was over, albeit the USA attempted to keep strong ties with countries such as the USSR (seen with US President Roosevelt’s friendship with USSR leader Joseph Stalin), ultimately, USA’s next steps were becoming increasingly dependent on the USA’s ideological differences to that of the USSR, bearing in mind the USA were capitalist and the USSR were communist/ Marxist- Leninist. This is evidenced with Truman (Roosevelt’s successor as US President)’s approach to the USSR at the Potsdam conference from the 17th July- 2nd August 1945.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
<h3>The Concert of Europe during the Age of Metternich.</h3>
Explanation:
The Concert of Europe was established by Metternich after the end of the French Revolution. With the end of the Napoleonic War, Europe was shattered into chaos, destruction and bloodshed. It needed a drastic revival.
In response to this, Austrian Prince Klemens von Metternich wanted to re-establish peace and progress in Europe. He wanted to bring an alliance between the European rulers. Therefore, he created the Concert of Europe on November 1815 to maintain a status quo in Europe. This alliance aimed at preserving the Vienna Settlement established after the end of the French Revolution and maintaining peace and friendship among the different rulers of Europe.
The European participation in the Greek Revolt was an attempt to establish the aims of the Concert of Europe. When Greek Civil war occurred during the 1820's, Europe rendered a great help to Greeks to establish full sovereignty. The European powers helped in the formation of a sovereign Greek state by mediating between the Turks and the Greeks. Thus, making the Concert of Europe a mediator of establishing peace and security in Europe.
Answer:
Electing representatives and giving them the responsibility and power to make laws and conduct government.
Explanation:
The Roman Republic is considered one of the earliest forms of democracy. Its government consisted of the Senate and four assemblies: the Comitia Curiata, the Comitia Centuriata, the Concilium Plebis, and the Comitia Tributa. (Comita means "Assembly of people")
How it worked: Two consuls were elected each year with the ability to veto the other, and additionally two censors were elected every five years. The majority of people in Rome could vote, however women and slaves were excluded.
