<span>The 250 years between 475 and 221 BC is called the Warring States Period because the region of the Zhou Dynasty was divided between 8 states. These states had frequent wars until 221 BC when Qin conquered them all. The fighting was sometimes fierce.</span>
Two problems that led to the dissolution of the League of Nations were:
- Its inaction when some of its members engaged in aggressive actions.
- The fact that some powerful nations were not members.
<h3>Why was the League of Nations dissolved?</h3>
The League of nations failed to properly act when Italy and Japan attacked Ethiopia and China even though all four countries were in the League. This led to a loss of confidence.
Two powerful nations were also not members which were Russia and the U.S. which made it hard to enforce policies.
Find out more on the League of Nations at brainly.com/question/14108935.
#SPJ1
Roosevelt became the youngest president in American history at the age of 42.
personally, I believe people will go without them, but it is also very possible people will look elsewhere for them, but its all a matter of perspective. I think that if the economy cannot produce the goods and services, no where else is able to either, thus, you'd go without it, and it isnt to say you wont want it. You will, maybe even more so. And I doubt people will focus on needs more than they already are, unless it gets worse for the consumer itself in that regard. I cant say im right though.
With respect to its colonies, British mercantilism meant that the government and the merchants became partners with the goal of increasing political power and private wealth, to the exclusion of other empires.