1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astraxan [27]
3 years ago
7

What was the purpose of banning labor unions in britain

History
2 answers:
SashulF [63]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

to prevent workers from organizing strikes and stopping production

Explanation:

Unions are known for organizing collective to bargain for better pays, better conditions, and more. By banning labor unions, the workers lose a lot of the bargaining power to do such things, therefore, it is less likely for those in charge to have the productions stopped.

Leviafan [203]3 years ago
3 0
To prevent workers from organizing strikes and stopping production
You might be interested in
The proclamation of_____ stated all land____ of the Appalachian mountains and east of the ______ river belonged to the ____
PolarNik [594]
The first one is Independence
3 0
2 years ago
What was one effect of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case?
Kay [80]

Answer:

It strengthened the legal protections of slavery

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How did Charlemagne command respect through his non-verbal presence?
sesenic [268]

Answer:

Charlemagne (Charles the great) also called Charles I, was king of Frank and Lombards, later under Pope Leo III he has crowned the emperor of Rome in 800 A.D. He was known for his political capabilities and military skills. Charlemagne bore a strong resemblance of a king with imposing height stature. His presence was always impressive and dignified, whether he was sitting or standing.

7 0
3 years ago
What do these headlines say about how the Supreme Court has addressed the principle of equality on which the United States was f
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
B is disqualified so my honest opinion is c
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Develop four hypothesis of different ways to end the war with Japan. Be sure the suggestions are realistic and reflect the perio
Snezhnost [94]
One option can be a full military campaign based on sending soldiers to take Japanese territory. One advantage is that the number of killed civilians would be drastically lower while another would be that nuclear weaponry would not be used and would not destroy the environment. Disadvantage would be the high amount of soldier casualties and another can be possibly a very lengthy war effort.

Another option could be a complete blockade of Japan. Since it's an island, it would be possible to blockade it from all sides and wait for Japanese people to surrender since they wouldn't be able to sustain for long without importing things. One advantage would be preventing the death of Japanese civilians and preventing deaths of US troops. Disadvantages would be that might actually endure hardships and still wouldn't surrender, and another could be that they might fight like guerrillas and attack ships and American troops

Another option can be an allied assault in which the US could attack together with Soviets and split Japan like Germany. Advantage would be reduced amount of killed Japanese civilians and reduced amount of killed American troops. The disadvantage could be that a split Japan would be problematic like split Germany was because of Communism, and another could be that it would enable soviets to spread their influence even more throughout Asia

Fourth option could be having a demonstration of the power of nuclear weaponry somewhere safe. The United States could show what they are capable of in order to scare Japan into surrender. One advantage is that Japanese civilians would not be harmed and another can be that they would still show the world how strong the United States bombs are. One disadvantage could be that Japanese people might still not surrender since there were many who wanted to stay in the war even after the two nukes, and another disadvantage could be that Japan might began preparing for nuclear warfare since they would now know what awaits them

The best possible option could be as a recommendation the naval blockade. If a naval blockade was combined with bombardment of strategic military areas then Japan would inevitably surrender even though it would take a few months at least. It would cost a lot but it would save the lives of many people who didn't have to suffer because of their government.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which technology permitted homesteaders in the west to plant crops in the prairie in the 1860s and 1870s?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the causes of the Second Industrial Revolution in the United States.
    12·1 answer
  • How did the reign of Ramses II affect the territories controlled by the Egyptian empire?
    14·2 answers
  • Read this passage:
    15·2 answers
  • How were the principles of humanism and the Protestant reformation similar
    10·1 answer
  • Limits on the number of weapons nations produce and employ
    9·1 answer
  • The founder of McDonald’s was born on this day in 1902. There is always a lot of discussion surrounding the unhealthy aspects of
    14·2 answers
  • HELPPP!!! Describe the events that led to Brown’s Execution in 1859.
    8·2 answers
  • The article below states the aims of an international organization.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was one of England's motivations
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!