Answer:
Finance Learning Corporation
Explanation:
Answer:
Increasing Canadian GDP:
-Toyota, a Japanese company, manufactures cars in Toronto, Ontario.
-ATI Technologies, a Canadian company, operates in Alberta.
Increasing American GDP:
-Toyota, a Japanese company, manufactures cars in San Antonio, Texas.
-Starbucks, a U.S. company, opens stores in New York state.
-Tim Horton's, a Canadian company, opens coffee shops in New England.
Explanation:
Gross domestic product (GDP) is the sum of all final goods and services produced in an economic space for a certain period, usually one year, excluding the intermediate consumption used in production. Until the 1980's, the use of Gross National Product (GNP) was preferred, a measure almost identical to GDP but incorporating goods and services produced by external factors. The variation in this macroeconomic magnitude is often used to measure economic growth.
Answer:
The correct word for the blank space is: did not.
Explanation:
The Kuehn v. Pub Zone is a court case where Karl Kuehn sued Maria Kerkoulas -the owner of Pub Zone bar in Union, New Jersey- because Kuehn was beaten by a motorcycle gang inside the men's bathroom of Pub Zone. Kerkoulas had knowledge of the irrational behavior of motorcycle gangs in the area though, on the day when the attack took place, the Pagan's gang surpassed security in Pub Zone yet Kerkoulas decided to attend them. Later, the gang was heading towards the back of the pub. Kerkoulas thought they were leaving but they were following Kuehn to the men's bathroom where he was seriously injured.
Kuehn sued Pub Zone and the jury awarded $300,000 in damages but the trial court judge overruled the jury's decision and Pub Zone ended up owing nothing to Kuehn. <em>The owner of a business is not the insurer of the customers and has no duty on any care of one of them until a major event occurs</em>. Then, even if Kerkoulas knew about the behavior of the motorcycle gang, she is not responsible for the care of Kuehn on the gang attacking him.
The greatest risk of a low-cost provider strategy is getting lost with overly high price reduction and ending up with lower profit.
<h3>Low-cost / low-price advantage </h3>
It results in high profit only if;
- (1) prices are reduced by less than the size of the cost advantage or
- (2) the added volume is large enough to bring in a bigger total profit despite lower margins per unit sold.
Therefore, the greatest risk is a low profit.
learn more on low cost strategy from here: brainly.com/question/5516605
Find the attachments sequence wise for complete solution
