The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
Freedom comes with responsibility — freedom isn't free. You need to remember that it is now on you to make sure you have a decent life. That means, in grown people terms that you “gotta do what you gotta do.”
Freedom can be heady, but you still need to do your work. Work first, freedom later.
Answer: Market economies utilize private ownership as the means of production and voluntary exchanges/contracts but in a command economy, governments own the factors of production such as land, capital, and resources.
Explanation:
Answer:
C) Her central idea is too vague and does not restrain the number of main points.
Explanation:
The statement "Dog care is very difficult" is very vague, because it is using an adjective that is very general, and can be interpreted or comprehended in many different ways.
Allison should instead try to narrow down her central idea. She could say that "Dog care is very difficult because of _______", or she could also use a more specific adjective accompanied by a supporting phrase like "Dog care is very expensive, costs are soaring"