Answer:
Susan B. Anthony first stated the purpose of her speech was to prove that she "not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny."
Explanation:
Susan B. Anthony was a women's rights activist in America and a social reformer who was a pioneering figure for the women suffrage movement in America. She was convicted of unlawfully participating in the presidential elections of 1872 of which her speech was based on.
In the opening paragraph of her speech, Susan B. Anthony stated that her aim was to prove that she did not do anything wrong in participating in the election. She stated that she had been <em>"indict[ed] for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote"</em>. She then proceeded to state that her main aim for giving this speech was to prove that she <em>"not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny."</em>
According to elm more long-lasting changes in audience perspectives occur if listeners process the speech message "centrally."
<h3>What is ELM?</h3>
ELM stands for elaboration likelihood model.
The dual process theory known as the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) of persuasion describes how attitudes change. Richard E. Petty and John Cacioppo created the ELM in 1980. The model seeks to clarify various methods of processing stimuli, their uses, and the effects they have on attitude change. The center route and the periphery route are the two main paths for persuasion suggested by the ELM.
The genuine qualities of the data offered in favor of an argument will probably be carefully and thoughtfully considered by a person under the central pathway, leading to persuasion. The central route requires a high degree of message elaboration in which the person receiving the message generates a significant amount of cognition about the arguments. The effects of changing one's attitude will be reasonably long-lasting, resilient, and behavior-predictive.
On the other hand, under the peripheral approach, persuasion happens when someone associates with favorable or unfavorable cues in the stimulus or makes a straightforward assumption about the merits of the stance that is being promoted. The cues that the person receives via the peripheral channel are typically unrelated to the stimuli' logical quality. These indications will be related to things like the message's production value, the message's sources' attractiveness or legitimacy, or both. The chance of elaboration will depend on a person's drive and capacity to assess the argument being made.
To learn more about elaboration likelihood model (ELM) with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/15827409
#SPJ4
Haven't learned this yet, but my best guess would be D. because in the cold wars, there was the Red Scare, which was somewhat like a Witch Hunt (like the salem witch trial) except they hunted down communists and persecuted them
Climax, the highest point were the most dramatic thing happens to the beginning
