Answer:
A. The relationship is proportional.
C. The slope is negative.
✓ A. The relationship is proportional.
-> We have a one to one proportion because the relationship is linear
✗ B. The slope is –6.
-> The slope is -3/2, not -3
-> We can pick a point, and then we count down 3 and over 2 to the next point
✓ C. The slope is negative.
-> Because the line is going from top left to bottom right the line is negative
✗ D. The y-intercept is –3.
-> The slope is -3/2, not -3
-> We can pick a point, and then we count down 3 and over 2 to the next point
✗ E. The equation of the line is y = –3x.
-> Again, the slope should be -3/2, not -3
Have a nice day!
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)
- Heather
Since x is the cost of the oranges per pound in cents, the total amount spent on oranges in cents is 3x. Then, you spent 59 cents on cucumbers and 35 cents on bananas. The total amount spent on all food is the sum of the individuals. 3x+59+35. Combine like terms to get 3x+94. This will give you your total in cents. If you need a total in dollars, you would just multiply that expression by 0.01.
Answer: D
H0: μ=522
H1: μ>522
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis (H0) tries to show that no significant variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean. While an alternative Hypothesis (Ha) attempt to prove that a new theory is true rather than the old one. That a variable is significantly different from the mean.
So, for this case;
The null hypothesis is that the mean score equals to 522
H0: μ=522
The alternative hypothesis is that the mean score is greater than 522.
H1: μ>522
He moved it at 30ft./minute